<b>Performance of organic management in the nutrition and productivity of the coffee crop</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.739
Abstract
There is already a great number of practical experiences with agroecological transition in the coffee plant (Coffea arabica L.), in small properties at the South region of Minas Gerais state, which inspired this research. The experiment was installed in a coffee crop (variety Catua・Amarelo, spacing 4.0 x 0.7 m and 6 years) age located in Lavras, (Minas Gerais state, Brazil). After the first year of agroecologic transition, the effects of organic and conventional management in the nutrition and productivity were evaluated. The experimental design used was the lattice balanced 4x4 in factorial scheme 3x2x2 with five replications and four additional treatments. The used organic management is efficient in the supply of N, P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Mn, B, Zn, Cu, and Fe for the coffee plant in production. The treatments of organic management showed a similar productivity to the conventional one due to the existence of nutrient reserves in the soil.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-02-12
How to Cite
Theodoro, V. C. de A., Guimarães, R. J., & Mendes, A. N. G. (2008). <b>Performance of organic management in the nutrition and productivity of the coffee crop</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.739. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 29(5), 631-638. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.739
Section
Crop Production
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 







































