Soybean canopy estimation using different image capture methods
Abstract
The determination of crop canopy characteristics (vegetation cover, leaf area, and leaf area index) is usually obtained through costly methods or methods that require training and time. Based on this, the aim of this work was to determine whether different methods and angles for capturing images using a smartphone camera and fisheye lenses can predict information about the soybean canopy in a practical, fast, and low-cost way. Different methods of capturing images were carried out throughout the soybean cycle using smartphones, attached fisheye lenses, manual normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) reading equipment, and destructive plant evaluations. The captured images were analyzed in the Canopeo app to determine the green cover fraction. Pearson’s correlation and regression models were used to study the association between NDVI and leaf area index (LAI). The data were compared in the vegetative and reproductive stage segments and throughout the crop cycle to determine whether the image acquisition methods were capable of estimating the variations at each crop stage. With the exception of images captured during the soybean’s reproductive stage, all methods proved to be suitable for evaluations and comparisons using the Canopeo app. Capturing images 1 m above the canopy and video were the methods that best estimated the NDVI and LAI of soybeans.
Downloads
References
Bianchi, S., Cahalan, C., Hale, S., & Gibbons, J. M. (2017). Rapid assessment of forest canopy and light regime using smartphone hemispherical photography. Ecology and Evolution, 7(24), 10556-10566. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3567
Büchi, L., Wendling, M., Mouly, P., & Charles, R. (2018). Comparison of visual assessment and digital image analysis for canopy cover estimation. Agronomy Journal, 110(4), 1289-1295. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.11.0679
Campana, M., Del Valle, T. A., Fernandes, L. S., Pereira, F. R. S., Garcia, T. M., Osório, J. A. C., Facco, F. B., & Morais, J. P. G. (2023). Canopeo and GreenSeeker applications as tools to support tropical pasture management. Ciência Rural, 53(6), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20220167
Carneiro, F. M., Furlani, C. E. A., Zerbato, C., Menezes, P. C., Gírio, L. A. S., & Oliveira, M. F. (2020). Comparação entre índices de vegetação para detecção de variabilidades espaciais e temporais na cultura da soja utilizando sensores de dossel. Agricultura de Precisão, 21, 979-1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-019-09704-3
Guo, W., Zheng, B., Duan, T., Fukatsu, T., Chapman, S., & Ninomiya, S. (2017). EasyPCC: Benchmark datasets and tools for high-throughput measurement of the plant canopy coverage ratio under field conditions. Sensors, 17(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040798
He, S., Li, X., Chen, M., Xu, X., Zhang, W., Chi, H., Shao, P., Tang, F., Gong, T., Guo, M., Xu, M., Yang, W., & Liu, W. (2024). Excellent canopy structure in soybeans can improve their photosynthetic performance and increase yield. Agriculture, 14(10), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101783
Heinonen, R., & Mattila, T. J. (2021). Smartphone based estimation of green cover depends on the camera used. Agronomy Journal, 113(6), 5597-5601. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20752
Kim, J., Yu, J.-K., Rodrogues, R., Kim, Y.-H., Park, J. E., Jung, J., Kang, S., Kim, K.-H., Baek, J.-H., Lee, E-B., & Chung, Y. (2022). Case study: cost-effective image analysis method to study drought stress of soybean in early vegetative stage. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 25, 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-021-00110-8
Lykhovyd, P. V., Vozhehova, R. A., Lavrenko, S. O., & Lavrenko, N. M. (2022). The study on the relationship between normalized difference vegetation index and fractional green canopy cover in five selected crops. The Scientific World Journal, 2022(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8479424
Mattos, E. M., Binkley, D., Campoe, O. C., Alvares, C. A., & Stape, J. L. (2020). Variation in canopy structure, leaf area, light interception and light use efficiency among Eucalyptus clones. Forest Ecology and Management, 463, 118038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118038
Nakano, H., Tanaka, R., Guan, S., & Ohdan, H. (2023). Predicting rice grain yield using normalized difference vegetation index from UAV and GreenSeeker. Crop and Environment, 2(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crope.2023.03.001
Patrignani, A., & Ochsner, T. E. (2015). Canopeo: A powerful new tool for measuring fractional green canopy cover. Agronomy Journal, 107(6), 2312-2320. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0150
Pierozan Junior, C., & Kawakami, J. (2013). Efficiency of the leaf disc method for estimating the leaf area index of soybean plants. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 35(4), 487-493. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v35i4.16290
Qu, Y., Gao, Z., Shang, J., Liu, J., & Casa, R. (2021). Simultaneous measurements of corn leaf area index and mean tilt angle from multi-directional sunlit and shaded fractions using downward-looking photography. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 180, 105881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105881
Rody, Y. P., Ribeiro, A., Pezzopane, J. E. M., Gleriani, J. M., Almeida, A. Q., & Leite, F. P. (2014). Estimativas do índice de área foliar (IAF) utilizando LAI-2000 e fotos hemisféricas em plantações de eucalipto. Ciência Florestal, 24(4), 925-934. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509816604
Schmitz, P. K., & Kandel, H. J. (2021). Using canopy measurements to predict soybean seed yield. Remote Sensing, 13(16), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163260
Shepherd, M. J., Lindsey, L. E., & Lindsey, A. J. (2018). Soybean canopy cover measured with Canopeo compared with light interception. Agricultural & Environmental Letters, 3(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2018.06.0031
Smith, A. M., & Ramsay, P. M. (2018). A comparison of ground-based methods for estimating canopy closure for use in phenology research. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 252, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.01.002
Srinivasan, V., Kumar, P., & Long, S. P. (2017). Decreasing, not increasing, leaf area index will raise crop yields under global atmospheric change. Global Change Biology, 23(4), 1626-1635. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13526
Tenreiro, T. R., García-Vila, M., Gómez, J. A., Jiménez-Berni, J. A., & Fereres, E. (2021). Using NDVI for the assessment of canopy cover in agricultural crops within modelling research. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 182(C), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106038
Tian, J., Liu, X., Zheng, Y., Xu, L., Huang, Q., & Hu, X. (2024). Improving Otsu method parameters for accurate and efficient in LAI measurement using fisheye lens. Forests, 15(7), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071121
Wang, J., Xiong, Q., Lin, Q., & Huang, H. (2017). Feasibility of using mobile phone to estimate forest Leaf Area Index: A case study in Yunnan Pine. Remote Sensing Letters, 9(2), 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2017.1399470
Wei, S., Yin, T., Dissegna, M. A., Whittle, A. J., Ow, G. L. F., Yusof, M. L. M., Lauret, N., & Gastellu-Etchegorry, J.-P. (2020). An assessment study of three indirect methods for estimating leaf area density and leaf area index of individual trees. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 292-293, 108101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108101
Xiong, Y., West, C. P., Brown, C. P., & Green, P. E. (2019). Digital image analysis of Old World Bluestem cover to estimate canopy development. Agronomy Journal, 111(3), 1247-1253. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.08.0502
Yin, G., Yonghua, Q., Verger, A., Li, J., Kun, J., Qiaoyun, X., & Guoxiang, L. (2022). Smartphone digital photography for fractional vegetation cover estimation. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 88(5), 303-310. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.21-00038R2
Copyright (c) 2026 Fernanda Trentin, Gizelli Moiano de Paula, Claudir José Basso, Diecson Ruy Orsolin da Silva (Autor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
