<b>Evaluation of urban trees at the central area of Maringá, Paraná State, estimating production and destination of residues</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i1.77
Abstract
The present article makes a quali-quantitative analysis of the present urban forestation in the Zone 1 of Maringá, Paraná State, emphasizing the trees with bad aim-sanitary condition, which should be removed. The main objective was to esteem the amount of wood (residues) formed by these trees and to compare the profitability of two types of final destination, firewood and production of briquettes. The obtained results show the existence of 2,860 trees in this area, out of which 1,341 are in bad condition and, in a near future, should be substituted by new copies. The removal will generate a dear amount estimated in 696.08 wood m3. If these are used for more profitable purposes (such as the production of briquettes), it will generate a total income of R$ 87,217.20, the double profitability of the firewood.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2007-08-20
How to Cite
De Angelis, B. L. D., Sampaio, A. C. F., Tudini, O. G., Assunção, M. G. T. de, & De Angelis Neto, G. (2007). <b>Evaluation of urban trees at the central area of Maringá, Paraná State, estimating production and destination of residues</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i1.77. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 29(1), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v29i1.77
Issue
Section
Crop Production
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 