<b>Effect of pruning and harvest time on cassava agronomic characteristics</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i1.922

  • Sandra Pereira de Oliveira UESB
  • Anselmo Eloy Silveira Viana UESB
  • Sylvana Naomi Matsumoto UESB
  • Nelson dos Santos Cardoso Júnior UESB
  • Tocio Sediyama UFV
  • Alcebíades Rebouças São José UESB
Keywords: cooking, roots production, starch production

Abstract

The experiment was performed at the Campus of Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia – UESB, in Vitoria da Conquista, Bahia-Brazil, from November 2005 to February 2007, aiming to evaluate the effect of pruning and harvest time on cassava agronomic characteristics. The experimental design used was randomized blocks, with three replications. The treatments were arranged according to a 6 x 2 factorial scheme, with six harvest times (30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 days after pruning) and two cultivation systems (with and without pruning). The results showed that pruned plants presented low aerial part weight and low productivity of tuberous roots, though a reduction of dry matter, starch and flour production was not observed, which were evaluated in kg ha-1. Tuberous roots, starch and flour production increase linearly with the harvest times. Cooking time was influenced by pruning. Pruned plant roots showed higher cooking time when compared to the roots of non pruned plants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anselmo Eloy Silveira Viana, UESB
Tem experiência na área de Agronomia, com ênfase em Manejo e Tratos Culturais, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: fitotecnia, tratos culturais, mandioca e planejamento experimental. Currículo Lattes
Published
2009-11-04
How to Cite
Oliveira, S. P. de, Viana, A. E. S., Matsumoto, S. N., Cardoso Júnior, N. dos S., Sediyama, T., & São José, A. R. (2009). <b>Effect of pruning and harvest time on cassava agronomic characteristics</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i1.922. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 32(1), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v32i1.922
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus