Towards a comprehensive sustainable assessment of beef cattle systems: integrating bioeconomics and animal science

Joana Gasparotto  Kuhn; Diego  Durante Mühl; Cainã Lima  Costa; Gabriela Allegretti; Letícia de Oliveira; Edson Talamini

doi:10.4025/actascianimsci.v46i1.61716

Joana Gasparotto Kuhn Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8846-9812
Diego Durante Mühl Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6556-4232
Cainã Lima Costa Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-7800
Gabriela Allegretti Instituto Brasileiro de Bioeconomia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-8585
Letícia de Oliveira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-4710
Edson Talamini Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-0447

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v46i1.61716

Palavras-chave: bioeconomy; bioeconomic; livestock; sustainability; thermodynamics.

Resumo

Studies with bioeconomic modeling can be identified in animal science. However, there are distinct typologies associated with the term bioeconomy with different meanings and approaches. The present study aims to examine the Bioeconomy/Bioeconomics approaches used in animal science research and discuss the implications and benefits of integrating these areas of knowledge. The method consisted of systematic literature review with quantitative and qualitative analyzes of the content of articles obtained from the Scopus^® database. In the process of searching and analyzing the articles, we defined beef cattle as representative of animal science. Followed the PRISMA Protocol guidelines. The results confirmed that the use of the term bioeconomic has been recurrent in this field of knowledge since 1994. However, the approach given to the term refers mainly to studies combining animal performance (bio) and economic returns (economic) because of variables of interest, evident in the set of indicators reported in the articles analyzed. Despite the relevance of these studies, we discuss some implications and reasons for adopting other bioeconomy approaches in animal science. We conclude that the integration between Bioeconomics and animal science can significantly broaden the scope of analysis, the what relevant to the contemporary challenges of promoting sustainable production systems.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Allain, S., Ruault, J.-F., Moraine, M., & Madelrieux, S. (2022). The ‘bioeconomics vs bioeconomy’ debate: Beyond criticism, advancing research fronts. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 58-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.11.004

Allegretti, G., Talamini, E., Schmidt, V., Bogorni, P. C., & Ortega, E. (2018). Insect as feed: an emergy assessment of insect meal as a sustainable protein source for the Brazilian poultry industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 403-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.244

Artuzo, F. D., Allegretti, G., Santos, O. I. B., Silva, L. X., & Talamini, E. (2021). Emergy unsustainability index for agricultural systems assessment: a proposal based on the laws of thermodynamics. Science of the Total Environment, 759, 143524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143524

Associação Brasileira das Indústrias Exportadoras de Carnes [ABIEC]. (2023). Beef report 2023: perfil da pecuária no Brasil. ABIEC. Retrieved from https://www.abiec.com.br/publicacoes/beef-report-2023-capitulo-01/

Befort, N. (2020). Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119923

Benez, S. M. (2002). Manual de homeopatia veterinária: indicações clínicas e patológicas – teoria e prática. São Paulo, SP: Robe Editorial.

Birner, R. (2018). Bioeconomy concepts. In I. Lewandowski (Eds.), Bioeconomy: shaping the transition to a sustainable, biobased economy (p. 17-38). Cham, CH: Springer.

Boldrini, I. I., Overbeck, G. E., & Trevisan, R. (2015). Biodiversidade de plantas. In V. P. Pillar, & O. Lange (Eds.), Os campos do sul (p. 53-62). Porto Alegre, RS: Rede Campos Sulinos/ UFRGS.

Bonauiti, M. (2011). From bioeconomics to degrowth: Georgescu-Roegen’s “new economics” in Eight Essays. London; New York: Routledge.

Bouwman, L., Goldewijk, K. K., Hoek, K. W. V. D., Beusen, A. H. W., Vuuren, D. P. V., Willems, J., … Stehfest, E. (2013). Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900-2050 period. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(52), 20882-20887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012878108

Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016). What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8(7), 691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691

Canozzi, M. E. A., Marques, P. R., Teixeira, O. S., Pimentel, C. M. M., Dill, M. D., & Barcellos, J. O. J. (2019). Typology of beef production systems according to bioeconomic efficiency in the south of Brazil. Ciência Rural, 49(10), e20190030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20190030

Carvalho, P. C. F., Santos, D. T., & Neves, F. P. (2007). Oferta de forragem como condicionadora da estrutura do pasto e do desempenho animal. In M. Dall'agnol, C. Nabinger, D. M. Santana, & R. J. Santos (Eds), Sustentabilidade produtiva do bioma pampa (p. 23-60). Porto Alegre, RS: Gráfica Metrópole Ltda.

Dick, M., Silva, M. A., Silva, R. R. F., Ferreira, O. G. L., Maia, M. S., Lima, S. F., ... Dewes, H. (2021). Environmental impacts of Brazilian beef cattle production in the Amazon, Cerrado, Pampa, and Pantanal biomes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127750

Diáz, M. J. M., García, V. D., Ramírez, C. A., Blanco, F. P., Domenech, F. R., & Marín, A. L. M. (2020). Effects of a concentrate rich in agro-industrial by-products on productivity results, carcass characteristics and meat quality traits of finishing heifers. Animals, 10(8), 1311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081311

Duarte, E., Fragoso, R., Smozinski, N., & Tavares, J. (2021). Enhancing bioenergy recovery from agro-food biowastes as a strategy to promote circular bioeconomy. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 9(1), 1080320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d8.0320

Dumont, B., Modernel, P., Benoit, M., Ruggia, A., Soca, P., Dernat, S., … Rossing, W. A. H. (2020). Mobilizing ecological processes for herbivore production: farmers and researchers learning together. Frontiers Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 544828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828

Ferreira, A., Marques, P., Ribeiro, B., Assemany, P., Mendonça, H. V., Barata, A., … Gouveia, L. (2018). Combining biotechnology with circular bioeconomy: from poultry, swine, cattle, brewery, dairy and urban wastewaters to biohydrogen. Environmental Research, 164, 32-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.02.007

Florindo, T. J., Florindo, G. I. B. M., Talamini, E., & Ruviaro, C. F. (2017). Improving feed efficiency as a strategy to reduce beef carbon footprint in the Brazilian Midwest region. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development (IJESD), 16(4), 379-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2017.087260

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2021). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. Rome, IT: FAO.

Gowdy, J., & Mesner, S. (1998). The Evolution of Georgescu-Roegen’s Bioeconomics. Review of Social Economy, 56(2), 136–156. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/29769942

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1960). Economic theory and agrarian economics. Oxford Economic Papers, 12(1), 1-40.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1970). The economics of production. American Economic Review, 60(2), 1-9.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1975). Energy and Economic myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41, 347-381.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1995). La décroissance: entropie, écologie, économie - Hardcover. Paris, FR: Sang de la Terre.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (2013). O decrescimento: entropia, ecologia, economia. São Paulo, SP: Senac.

Guedes, V. L. S., & Borschiver, S. (2005). Bibliometria: uma ferramenta estatística para a gestão da informação e do conhecimento, em sistemas de informação, de comunicação e de avaliação científica e tecnológica. Ponto de Acesso, 6(1), 18.

Liao, W., R. Heijungs, & Huppes, G. (2012). Thermodynamic analysis of humanenvironment systems: A review focused on industrial ecology. Ecological Modelling, 228, 76-88.

Liu, J., You, L., Amini, M., Obersteiner, M., Herrero, M., Zehnder, A. J. B., & Yang, H. (2010). A high-resolution assessment on global nitrogen flows in cropland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(17), 8035-8040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913658107

López-Paredes, J., Jiménez-Montero, J.-A., Pérez-Cabal, M.-A., González-Recio, O., & Alenda, R. (2017). A bio-economic model to improve profitability in a large national beef cattle population. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 15(3), e0406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017153-10901

Macintosh, K. A., Doody, D. G., Withers, P. J. A., McDowell, R. W., Smith, D. R., Johnson, L. T., … McGrath, J. W. (2019). Transforming soil phosphorus fertility management strategies to support the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from agricultural systems. The Science of the total environment, 649, 90–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.272

Marques, P. R., Peripolli, V., Lampert, V. N., Dias, E. A., Pereira, G. R., Oliveira, T. E., … Barcellos, J. O. J. (2017). A proposal for the evaluation of the bioeconomic efficiency of beef cattle production systems. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 46(1), 65-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017000100010

Mayumi, K. (2009). Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen: His bioeconomics approach to development and change. Development and Change, 40(6), 1235-1254.

Mazoyer, M., & Roudart, L. (2009). História das agriculturas no mundo: do neolítico à crise contemporânea. São Paulo, SP: Unesp/Nead.

Mohammadian, M. (2003). What is bioeconomics: biological economics? Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 14(4), 319-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02601079X03001400401

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6(7), e1000097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Mougenot, B., & Doussoulin, J.-P. (2021). Conceptual evolution of the bioeconomy: a bibliometric analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 1031-1047.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01481-2

Muñoz-Ulecia, E., Bernués, A., Briones-Hidrovo, A., Casasús, I., & Martín-Collado, D. (2023a). Dependence on the socio-economic system impairs the sustainability of pasture-based animal agriculture. Scientific Reports, 13, 14307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41524-4

Muñoz-Ulecia, E., Bernués, A., Briones-Hidrovo, A., Franzese, P. P., Buonocore, E., Santagata, R., … Martín-Collado, D. (2023b). An increased dependence on agricultural policies led European grazing agroecosystems to an unsustainability trap. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(269). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00933-z

Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5), 323-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510500052444

Nichele, E. M., Moraes, E. H. B. K., Araújo, C. V., Pina, D. S., Moraes, K. A. K., & Hoffmann, A. (2015). Eficiência bioeconômica de bovinos de corte em confinamento. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 16(3), 699-711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402015000300020

Oaigen, R. P., Barcellos, J. O. J., Christofari, L. F., Braccini Neto, J., Oliveira, T. E., & Prates, Ê. R. (2008). Melhoria organizacional na produção de bezerros de corte a partir dos centros de custos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(3), 580-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008000300025

Odum, H. T. (1996). Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. New York, NY: Jhon Wiley & Sons.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2009). The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda. Retrieved from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/the-bioeconomy-to-2030/executive-summary_9789264056886-2-en

Paarlberg, R. (2009). The ethics of modern agriculture. Society, 46, 4–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-008-9168-3.

Pazdiora, R. D., Resende, F. D., Faria, M. H., Siqueira, G. R., Almeida, G. B. S., Sampaio, R. L., … Prietto, M. S. R. (2013). Animal performance and carcass characteristics of Nellore young bulls fed coated or uncoated urea slaughtered at different weights. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 42(4), 273-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982013000400007

Reinheimer, H. (1913). Evolution by cooperation. A study in bio-economics. London, GB: Kegan Paul & Company.

Reis, J. C., Rodrigues, G. S., Barros, I., Rodrigues, R. A. R., Garrett, R. D., Valentim, J. F., … Smukler, S. (2021). Integrated crop-livestock systems: a sustainable land-use alternative for food production in the Brazilian Cerrado and Amazon. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283, 124580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124580

Rice, P., O’brien, D., Shalloo, L., & Holden, N. M. (2017). Evaluation of allocation methods for calculation of carbon footprint of grass-based dairy production. Journal of Environmental Management, 202(Part 1), 311-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.071

Rótolo, G. C., Rydberg, T., Lieblein, G., & Francis, C. (2007). Emergy evaluation of grazing cattle in Argentina's Pampas. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 119(3-4), 383-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.08.011.C.M.V.B

Santana, R. A. V., Barbosa, R. A., Mandarino, C. F., & Lobo, C. F. (2013). Bioeconomic performance of intensive breeding systems and of full-cycle by way of simulation. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 65, 1773-1782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352013000600027

Savian, J. V., Schons, R. M. T., Marchi, D. E., Freitas, T. S., Silva Neto, G. F., Mezzalira, J. C., … Carvalho, P. C. F. (2018). Rotatinuous stocking: a grazing management innovation that has high potential to mitigate methane emissions by sheep. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 602-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.162

Sessim, A. G., Oliveira, T. E., López-González, F., Freitas, D. S., & Barcellos, J. O. J. (2020). Efficiency in cow-calf systems with different ages of cow culling. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00476

Silva, P. H. F., Carvalho, C. A. B., Malafaia, P., Garcia, F. Z., Peres, A. A. C., Souza, P. M., … Ferreira, R. L. (2019). Análise bioeconômica de períodos de suplementação proteico-energética na estação seca para novilhas Nelore em pastagem diferida de Urochloa decumbens. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 71(3), 1058-1066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10511

Smith, O. M., Kennedy, C. M., Owen, J. P., Northfield, T. D., Latimer, C. E., & Snyder, W. E. (2019). Highly diversified crop–livestock farming systems reshape wild bird communities. Ecological Applications, 30(2), e02031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2031

Souza Filho, W., Nunes, P. A. A., Barro, R. S., Kunrath, T. R., Almeida, G. M., Moraes Genro, T. C., … Carvalho, P. C. F. (2019). Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through pasture management in integrated crop-livestock systems: trade-offs between animal performance and environmental impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 968-975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.245

Tanure, S., Nabinger, C., & Becker, J. L. (2013). Bioeconomic model of decision support system for farm management. Part I: Systemic conceptual modeling, Agricultural Systems, 115, 104-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.08.008.

Tilica, E. (2021). Bioeconomy and bioeconomics: are they the same thing? International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, 1(33), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30032021/7470

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2019). Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.13. Leiden, NL: Universiteit Leiden.

Vivien, F.-D., Nieddu, M., Befort, N., Debref, R., & Giampietro, M. (2019). The hijacking of the bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027

Wang, X., Wu, X., Yan, P., Gao, W., Chen, Y., & Sui, P. (2016). Integrated analysis on economic and environmental consequences of livestock husbandry on different scale in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 119, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.084

Wu, X., Wu, F., Tong, X., & Jiang, B. (2013). Emergy-based sustainability assessment of an integrated production system of cattle, biogas, and greenhouse vegetables: Insight into the comprehensive utilization of wastes on a large-scale farm in Northwest China. Ecological Engineering, 61(Part A), 335-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.060

Zawojska, A., & Siudek, T. (2016). Bioeconomics as an interdisciplinary science. International Conference “Economic Science For Rural Development”, 41, 273-280.

Towards a comprehensive sustainable assessment of beef cattle systems: integrating bioeconomics and animal science

Resumo

Downloads

Referências

Funding data