Ingredient diameter and apparent digestibility of diet by two tropical fish species
Abstract
This research was carried out at the Aquatic Organisms Nutrition Research Laboratory, FMVZ - Unesp - Campus of Botucatu, a unit of Aquaculture Center of Unesp (Universidade Estadual de São Paulo) - Brazil. The objective was to evaluate the ingredient diameter influence (0.5; 1.0; 1.5; 2.0 and 2.5 mm), using the apparent digestibility of diets by Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. (Perciformes cichlidae) and pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg) Characiformes, Characidae). The coefficients were determined according to dry matter, crude protein and ether extract. These treatments were analyzed by variance analysis in the factorial design 2 x 5 (two fish species and five diameters). The result showed that there is significant interaction between ingredient diamater and species and that, the most appropriate ingredient diameter to manufacture fish diets is between 1.0 and 2.0 mm to pacu and 1.5 mm to Nile tilapia.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-29
How to Cite
Pezzato, L. E., Miranda, E. C. de, Furuya, W. M., Pinto, L. G. Q., Barros, M. M., & Rosa, G. J. M. (2008). Ingredient diameter and apparent digestibility of diet by two tropical fish species. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 24, 901-907. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v24i0.2341
Issue
Section
Animal Science
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
- I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.
0.9
2019CiteScore
29th percentile
Powered by 