Evaluation <em>in situ</em> of <em>Brachiaria decumbens</em> Stapf cv. Basilisk hay submitted to treatment with anydhrous ammonia or urea

  • Beneval Rosa UFG
  • Ricardo Andrade Reis UNESP
  • Kléber Tomás de Resende UNESP
  • Clóves Cabreira Jobim UEM
  • Luís Roberto Andrade Rodrigues UNESP

Abstract

Brachiaria decumbens Stapf cv. Basilisk hay ammoniation effects were evaluated at Unesp, Câmpus de Jaboticabal, state of São Paulo, Brazil, after harvesting at seed maturation stage and submitted to the following treatments: untreated and treated with NH3 (2.0% and 3.0% DM) or with urea (3.6% and 5.4% DM), using in situ technique with incubation bags in the rumen of fistulated animals. The experiment was conducted in split-plot randomized blocks with 3 replications. Ammoniation increased (P < 0.05) DM, OM, CP and NDF consumption rates in 6, 24 and 96-hour incubation period, but it did not affect hay degradation rates. The treatment with NH3 increased (P < 0.05) DM, OM and NDF degradation potential. The highest CP effective degradation was caused by 5.4% urea level, and the results of this investigation led to the conclusion that NH3 may be replaced by urea and that the inclusion of 5.4% of urea is the most appropriate to Brachiaria decumbens hay treatment in advanced maturation stages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Beneval Rosa, UFG
Atualmente é professor titular da Universidade Federal de Goiás. Tem experiência na área de Zootecnia, com ênfase em Avaliação, Produção e Conservação de Forragens, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: composição química, produção de matéria seca, adubação, adubação orgânica e manejo de pastagens. Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-07-16
How to Cite
Rosa, B., Reis, R. A., Resende, K. T. de, Jobim, C. C., & Rodrigues, L. R. A. (2008). Evaluation <em>in situ</em> of <em>Brachiaria decumbens</em&gt; Stapf cv. Basilisk hay submitted to treatment with anydhrous ammonia or urea. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 20, 317-323. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v20i0.4367
Section
Zootecny

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus