<b>Diferent levels of sodium formate in replacement of sodium chloride in broiler diets</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i3.6020

  • Rita de Albernaz Gonçalves da Silva UFPel
  • João Carlos Maier UFPEL
  • Fabiane Pereira Gentilini UFPEL
  • Marcos Antonio Anciuti UFPEL
  • Everton Krabbe BASF-Badische Anilin- und Soda-Fabrik
  • Débora Cristina Nichelle Lopes UFPEL
Keywords: carcass, electrolyte balance, performance, sodium sources

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the use of sodium formate as a source of sodium in replacement of sodium chloride for broilers. A total of 690 female Ross broiler chickens were divided into five treatments with 6 replicates each. Each replicate had 23 birds. Treatments consisted of: T1 (control), T2 (sodium formate 0.20%Na+ with ammonium chloride), T3 (sodium formate 0.20%Na+ without ammonium chloride), T4 (sodium formate 0.16%Na+ with ammonium chloride) and T5 (sodium formate 0.12%Na+ without ammonium chloride). Ammonium chloride was added to some of the treatments to balance the electrolyte balance of the diets. Data were analyzed using ANOVA 5%. Means were separated using Tukey test.The use of sodium formate had no effect on performance and carcass traits of broilers. These results indicate that sodium formate can be used as a sodium source in replacement of sodium chloride for broilers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rita de Albernaz Gonçalves da Silva, UFPel
Tem experiência na área de Zootecnia , com ênfase em Produção Animal. Atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: sódio, cloro, promotor crescimento, equilibrio eletrolítico, ácidos orgânicos. Currículo Lattes
Published
2009-09-22
How to Cite
Silva, R. de A. G. da, Maier, J. C., Gentilini, F. P., Anciuti, M. A., Krabbe, E., & Lopes, D. C. N. (2009). <b>Diferent levels of sodium formate in replacement of sodium chloride in broiler diets</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i3.6020. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 31(3), 251-255. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i3.6020
Section
Nonruminant Nutrition

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus