<b>Methods of feces collection and mineral balance of pigs fed diets supplemented or not with probiotic</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v29i4.999
Abstract
Two metabolism assays were conducted, with eight growing castrated male crossbred pigs in each assay. In the first assay, the levels of DM, CP, GE, EE, MM and NDF were compared in feces, collected through two different methods: directly from the animal’s rectum or from a collection tray, collected simultaneously from each pig. The second assay evaluated the animals’ mineral balance. For this study, the animals were submitted to two treatments: T1 - basal feed and T2 - basal feed + 200ppm of probiotic. The nutrients levels were similar in the feces collected through both methods, with the exception of DM. There was no observable difference (p > 0.05) in mineral balance between the animals fed diets containing or not probiotic. Both collection methods can be undertaken simultaneously in mineral balance assays.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-03-06
How to Cite
Robles-Huaynate, R. A., Thomaz, M. C., Budiño, F. H. L., Ruiz, U. dos S., Watanabe, P. H., & Pascoal, L. A. F. (2008). <b>Methods of feces collection and mineral balance of pigs fed diets supplemented or not with probiotic</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v29i4.999. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 29(4), 395-401. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v29i4.999
Issue
Section
Nonruminant Nutrition
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
- I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.
0.9
2019CiteScore
29th percentile
Powered by 