<b>Methods of feces collection and mineral balance of pigs fed diets supplemented or not with probiotic</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v29i4.999

  • Rizal Alcides Robles-Huaynate UNESP
  • Maria Cristina Thomaz UNESP
  • Fábio Henrique Lemos Budiño APTA
  • Urbano dos Santos Ruiz UNESP
  • Pedro Henrique Watanabe UNESP
  • Leonardo Augusto Fonseca Pascoal UNESP

Abstract

Two metabolism assays were conducted, with eight growing castrated male crossbred pigs in each assay. In the first assay, the levels of DM, CP, GE, EE, MM and NDF were compared in feces, collected through two different methods: directly from the animal’s rectum or from a collection tray, collected simultaneously from each pig. The second assay evaluated the animals’ mineral balance. For this study, the animals were submitted to two treatments: T1 - basal feed and T2 - basal feed + 200ppm of probiotic. The nutrients levels were similar in the feces collected through both methods, with the exception of DM. There was no observable difference (p > 0.05) in mineral balance between the animals fed diets containing or not probiotic. Both collection methods can be undertaken simultaneously in mineral balance assays.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maria Cristina Thomaz, UNESP
Atualmente é professor assistente doutor da Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho. Tem experiência na área de Zootecnia, com ênfase em Avaliação de Alimentos para Animais, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: alimentação, nutrição, suínos, leitões e consumo de ração. Iniciou a orientação na Pós Graduação em 1999. Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-03-06
How to Cite
Robles-Huaynate, R. A., Thomaz, M. C., Budiño, F. H. L., Ruiz, U. dos S., Watanabe, P. H., & Pascoal, L. A. F. (2008). <b>Methods of feces collection and mineral balance of pigs fed diets supplemented or not with probiotic</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v29i4.999. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 29(4), 395-401. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v29i4.999
Section
Nonruminant Nutrition

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus