<b>Forage yield of Coastcross-1 pastures inoculated with <i>Azospirillum brasilense

  • Priscila Flôres Aguirre Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Clair Jorge Olivo Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Patricia Fernandes Rodrigues Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Débora Ribeiro Falk Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Carine Beatriz Adams Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Helena Parcianello Schiafino Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Palavras-chave: botanical composition, Cynodon dactylon, diazotrophic bacteria.

Resumo

 

The high cost of nitrogen fertilizers increases the expenses in pasture-based animal production. The inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria is an alternative to reduce the costs. This study evaluated the forage yield of Coastcross-1 pastures inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense, fertilized with different levels of nitrogen and subjected to cuts. The experiment was a factorial randomized block design with three replications. The factors were the inoculation (without inoculation, inoculated only at planting and reinoculated in the second year), levels of nitrogen (0, 100 and 200 kg ha-1 year-1 N) and seasons (spring, summer, fall and winter) when cuts were made. Forage yield, forage accumulation rate, botanical and structural pasture composition were evaluated. Forage yield without nitrogen fertilizer in pastures was in the first year 9.1, 11.7 and 11.7 t ha-1 DM, and in the second year 8.6, 11.2 and 11.5 t ha-1 DM, for the factor inoculation, respectively. The forage yield rises with inoculation at pasture planting, without nitrogen fertilization. Reinoculation is not necessary.

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Publicado
2017-12-27
Como Citar
Aguirre, P. F., Olivo, C. J., Rodrigues, P. F., Falk, D. R., Adams, C. B., & Schiafino, H. P. (2017). <b>Forage yield of Coastcross-1 pastures inoculated with <i&gt;Azospirillum brasilense. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 40(1), e36392. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v40i0.36392
Seção
Forragicultura

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus