Beak trimming in japanese quails at initial phase is an alternative to reduce the negative effects of feather pecking

  • Jéssica Moraes Cruvinel Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1641-2208
  • Andressa Takahara Montenegro Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’
  • Caio Cesar dos Ouros Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’ https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9801-6876
  • Kauan de Souza Alves Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’
  • Gabriela Costa Ribeiro Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-6230
  • Tatiane Souza dos Santos Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’
  • Andrea de Britto Molino Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’
  • Edivaldo Antônio Garcia Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’
Palavras-chave: Coturnix coturnix japonica; feather pecking; welfare; egg quality

Resumo

Regarding the lack of standardized methods for beak trimming to reduce feather pecking in Japanese quail, the present study aimed to compare two ages and 3 methods of beak trimming, evaluating the performance, egg quality and feather pecking. One-day-old Japanese quails (n = 770; 22 birds cage-1), at the initial phase, and 36-day-old (n = 630; 18 birds cage-1), at the production phase, were assigned to a completely randomized design, consisting of 7 treatments with 5 replicates. The treatments were: non-trimmed (NT), cauterization of approximately 1/3 at 14 days-of-age (CAUT 14) and at 28 days-of-age (CAUT 28), moderately trimmed to approximately 1/3 beak at 14 days-of-age (MOD 14) and at 28 days-of-age (MOD 28), severely trimmed to 1/3-1/2 beak at 14 days-of-age (SEV 14) and at 28 days-of-age (SEV 28). Data were analyzed using Minitab®. The results indicated that beak trimming methods applied did not influence the performance and egg quality. Quails subjected to MOD 28 and SEV (14 and 28) presented lower feed conversion per egg mass compared to NT. However, MOD 14 and SEV were more efficient in preventing feather pecking behavior.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Acioli, M. I. A. (2012). A importância da qualidade de uma franga: os fatores que influenciam o desempenho das aves desde a aquisição até a fase de crescimento. Revista do Ovo, 57(1), 14-18.

Araújo, L. F., Café, M. B., Junqueira, O. M., Araújo, C. S. S., Mogyca, N. S. S., & Cunha, M.I.R., (2000). Diferentes níveis de debicagem para frangas comerciais. ARS Veterinária, 16(1), 46-51.

Beak Trimming Action Group [BTAG]. (2015). The beak trimming action group’s review. London, UK: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/beak-trimming-action-group-review

Bertechini, A.G. (2013). Situação atual e perspectivas da coturnicultura industrial. In Anais do IV Simpósio Internacional and III Congresso Brasileiro de Coturnicultura (p. 1-6). Lavras, MG.

Blokhuis, H. J., Fiks Van Niekerk, T., Bessei, W., Elson, A., Guémené, D., Kjaer, J. B., ...Van De Weerd, H. A. (2007). The lay well project: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens. World’s Poultry Science, 63(1), 101-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001328

Cheng, H. (2006). Morpho-pathological changes and pain in beak trimmed laying hens. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 62(1), 41-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200583

Cunningham, D. L. (1992). Beak trimming effects on performance, behaviour and welfare of chickens: a review. Journal Applied Poultry Research, 1(1), 29-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/1.1.129

Fahey, A. G., Marchant-Forde, R. M., & Cheng, H. W. (2007). Relationship between body weight and beak characteristics in one-day-old white leghorn chicks: its implications for beak trimming. Poultry Science, 86(7), 1312-1315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.7.1312

Faitarone, A. B. G., Pavan, A. C., Mori, C., Batista, L. S., Oliveira, R. P., Garcia, E. A., ... Sherer, M. R. (2005). Economic traits and performance of Italian Quails Reared at different cage stocking densities. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 7(1), 19-22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2005000100003

Freire, R., Eastwood, M. A., & Joyce, M. (2011). Minor beak trimming in chickens leads to loss of mechanoreception and magnetoreception. Journal Animal Science, 89(4), 1201-1206.

Gentle, M. J. (1986). Beak trimming in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal, 42(3), 268-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19860021

Hartcher, M. K., Tran, M. K. T. N., Wilkinson, S. J., Hemsworth, P. H,, Thomson, P. C., & Cronin, G. M. (2015). Plumage damage in free-range laying hens: behavioural characteristics in the rearing period and the effects of environmental enrichment and beak-trimming. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 164(1), 64-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.12.011

Hughes, C., Struthers, S., Shynkaruk, T., Gomis, S., Gupta, A., & Schewean-Larder, K. Research note: beak morphology of infrared beak–treated laying hens and its impact on production and welfare. Poultry Science, 99(3),1395-1399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.003.

Janczak, A. M., & Riber, A. B. (2015). Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens. Poultry Science, 94(7), 1454-1469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev123

Kuenzel, W. J. (2007). Neurobiological basis of sensory perception: welfare implications of beak trimming. Poultry Science, 86(6), 1273-1282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.6.1273

Lambton, S. L., Nicol, C. J., Friel, M., Main, D. C., McKinstry, J. L., Sherwin, C. M., … Weeks, C. A. (2013). A bespoke management package can reduce the levels of injurious pecking in loose housed laying hen flocks. Veterinary Record, 172(16), 423-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.101067

Lambton, S. L., Knowles, T. G., Yorke, C., & Nicol, C. J. (2015). The risk factors affecting the development of vent pecking and cannibalism in free-range and organic laying hens. Animal Welfare, 24(1), 101-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.1.101

Laganá, C., Pizzolante, C. C., Togashi, C. K., Kakimoto, S. K., Saldanha, E. S. P. B., & Álvares, V. (2011). Influência de métodos de debicagem e do tipo de bebedouro no desempenho e na qualidade dos ovos de codornas japonesas. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40(6), 1217-1221.

Leandro, N. S. M., Vieira, N. S., Matos, M. S., Café, M. B., Stringhini, J. H., & Santos, D. A. (2005). Desempenho produtivo de codornas japonesas (Coturnix coturnix japonica) submetidas a diferentes densidades e tipos de debicagem, Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 27(1), 129-135.

Lee, H. Y., & Craig, J.V. (1991). Beak trimming effects on behavior pattems, fearfulness, feathering, and mortality among three white leghorn pullets in cage or floor pens. Poultry Science, 70(2), 211-212.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0700211

Kaesberg, A. K. U., Louton, H., Erhard, M., Schmidt, P., Zepp, M., Helmer, F., & Schwarzer, A. (2018). Development of a prognostic tool for the occurrence of feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens. Poultry Science, 97(3), 820-833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex369

Marchant-Forde, R. M., Fahey, A. G., & Cheng, H. W. (2010). Different effects of infrared and one-half hot blade beak trimming on beak topography and growth. Poultry Science, 89(12), 2559-2564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00890

Minitab Statistical Software (2017). Computer software minitab ver. 18. State College, PA: Minitab Inc.

Moreng, R. E., & Avens, J. S. (1990). Ciência e produção de aves. São Paulo, SP: Roca.

Murakami, A. E., & Ariki, J. (1998). Produção de codornas japonesas. Jaboticabal, SP: Funep.

Nicol, C. J., Bestman, M., Gilani, A. M., Haas, E. M., Jong, I.S., Lambton, S., … Rodenburg, T. B. (2013). The prevention and control of feather pecking: application to commercial systems. World's Poultry Science Journal, 69(4), 775-778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000809

Pizzolante, C. C., Garcia, E. A., Saldanha, E. A. P. B., Laganá, C., Batista, L., Deodato, A. P., & Souza, A. L. P. (2006). Break trimming methods and their effect on the performance of japanese quails pullets (Coturnix japonica). Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 8(4), 213-216. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000400002

Riedstra, B., & Groothuis, T. G. G. (2002). Early feather pecking as a form of social exploration: the effect of group stability on feather pecking and tonic immobility in domestic chicks. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 77(2), 127-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00031-X

Rodenburg, T. B., Van Krimpen, M. M., Jong, I. C., Haas, E. N., Kops, M. S., Riedstra, B. J., … Nicol, C. J. (2013). The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 69(2), 361-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000354

Rostagno, H. S., Albino, L F T., Donzele, J. L., Gomes, P. C., Oliveira, R. F., Lopes, D. C., ... Euclides, R. F. (2011). Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais (3th ed.). Viçosa, MG: Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

Silva, J. H. V., & Costa, F. G. P. (2009). Tabelas para codornas japonesas e europeias. (2nd ed.). Jaboticabal, SP: FUNEP.

Struthers, S., Classen, H. L., Gomis, S., Crowe, T. G., & Schwean-Lardner, K. (2019). The impact of beak tissue sloughing and beak shape variation on the behavior and welfare of infrared beak-treated layer pullets and hens. Poultry Science, 98(10), 4269-4281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez274

Publicado
2022-03-07
Como Citar
Cruvinel, J. M., Montenegro, A. T., Ouros, C. C. dos, Alves, K. de S., Ribeiro, G. C., Santos, T. S. dos, Molino, A. de B., & Garcia, E. A. (2022). Beak trimming in japanese quails at initial phase is an alternative to reduce the negative effects of feather pecking. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 44(1), e54129. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v44i1.54129
Seção
Produção Animal

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus