Filiform papillae of Holstein heifer tongues and their relationship with Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus infestation
Resumo
Mammals’ self-cleaning behavior helps to reduce infestations of ectoparasites, especially ticks. We investigated the relationship between measurements of the filiform papillae of heifer tongues and tick infestation. To assess the papillae, biopsies were performed on the anterior surface of the tongues of 15 Holstein heifers. The samples were processed for evaluation by scanning electron microscopy. Statistical analysis was performed through a completely randomized design. The parameters studied were submitted to analysis of variance to determine the effect of infestation on the length and base width of the papillae, distance between bases and between tips, and number of papillae per unit area. Heifers with greater numbers of papillae (16.68 ± 3.30 cm2) and shorter filiform papillae (1.28 ± 0.35mm) had fewer ticks (P < 0.01) than heifers with fewer papillae (15.46 ± 1.91 cm2) and longer lengths (1.45 ± 0.39mm). We concluded that the morphology of the filiform papillae varies between cattle of the same breed and that the length and the number of papillae per unit area are related to tick infestation.
Downloads
Referências
Akinyi, M. Y., Tung, J., Jeneby, M., Patel, N. B., Altmann, J., & Alberts, S. C. (2013). Role of grooming in reduction tick load in wild baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Animal Behavior, 85(3), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.012
Benetti, E. J., Pícoli, L. C., Guimarães, J. P., Motoyama, A. A., Miglino, M. A., & Watanabe, L. S. (2009). Characteristics of filiform, fungiform and vallate papillae and surface of interface epithelium-connective tissue of the Maned Sloth tongue mucosa (Bradypus torquatus Iliger, 1811): Light and scanning electron microscopy study. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 38(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0264.2008.00890.x
Bennett, G. F. (1969). Boophilus microplus: Experimental infestations on cattle restrained from grooming. Experimental Parasitology, 26(3), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4894(69)90125-8
Boshell, J. L., Wilborn, W. H., & Singh, B. B. (1982). Filiform papillae of cat tongue. Acta Anatomica, 114(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000145583
De Paz Cabello, P., Chamorro, C. A., Sandoval, J., & Fernandez, F. (1988). Comparative scanning electron-microscopic study of the lingual papillae in two species of domestic mammals (Equus caballus and Bos taurus). II. Mechanical papillae. Acta Anatomica, 132(2), 120–123. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3414356/
Dyce, K. M., Sack, W. O., & Wensing, C. J. G. (2004). Tratado de anatomia veterinária (3. ed.). Elsevier.
Eckstein, R. A., & Hart, B. L. (2000). Grooming and control of fleas in cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 68(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00095-2
Eurell, J. A., Frappier, B. L., & Dellmann, H. (2006). Textbook of veterinary histology (6. ed.). Lea & Febiger.
Grisi, L., Leite, R. C., Martins, J. R. S., Barros, A. T. M., Andreotti, R., Cançado, P. H. D., Pérez de León, A. A., Pereira, J. B., & Villela, H. S. (2014). Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Parasitology, 23(2), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612014042
Hart, B. L. (2000). Role of grooming in biological control of ticks. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 916(1), 565–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05337.x
Iwasaki, S. (2002). Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. Journal of Anatomy, 201(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00073.x
Karnovsky, M. J. (1965). A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron-microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology, 27, 137-138. https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=fc310cec-cfa9-45de-81fe-fb78f22ca683
Kemp, D. H., Koudstaal, D., Roberts, J. A., & Kerr, J. D. (1976). Boophilus microplus: The effect of host resistance on larval attachments and growth. Parasitology, 73(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000051386
Kilinc, M., Erdogan, S., Ketani, S., & Ketani, M. A. (2010). Morphological study by scanning electron microscopy of the lingual papillae in the middle east blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi, Nehring, 1898). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 39(6), 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0264.2010.01022.x
Koudstaal, D., Kemp, D. H., & Kerr, J. D. (1978). Boophilus microplus rejection of larvae from British breed cattle. Parasitology, 76(3), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000048241
Mooring, M. S., Blumstein, D. T., & Stoner, C. (2004). The evolution of parasite-defence grooming in ungulates. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 81(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00273.x
Mooring, M. S., & Hart, B. L. (1997). Self-grooming in impala mothers and lambs: Testing the body size and tick challenge principles. Animal Behaviour, 53(5), 925–934. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0341
Mooring, M. S., McKenzie, A. A., & Hart, B. L. (1996). Grooming in impala: Role of oral grooming in removal of ticks and effects of ticks in increasing grooming rate. Physiology & Behavior, 59(4-5), 965–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(95)02186-8
Mooring, M. S., & Samuel, W. M. (1998). Tick defense strategies in bison: The role of grooming and hair coat. Behaviour, 135(6), 693–718.
Riek, R. F. (1956). Factors influencing the susceptibility of cattle to tick infestation. Australian Veterinary Journal, 32(8), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1956.tb05660.x
Sari, E. K. (2010). Characteristics of dorsal lingual papillae of Zavot cattle. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.123.130
Shao, B. P., Long, R. J., Ding, Y. P., Wang, J. P., Ding, L. M., & Wang, H. C. (2010). Morphological adaptations of yaks (Bos grunniens) tongue to the foraging environment of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Animal Science, 88(8), 2594–2603. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2398
Snowball, G. J. (1956). The effect of self-licking by cattle in infestations of cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9560227
Steflik, D. E., Singh, B. B., McKinney, R. V., Jr., & Boshell, J. L. (1983). Correlated TEM, SEM, and histological observation of filiform papillae of the cow tongue. Acta Anatomica, 117(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000145767
Svejda, J., & Skach, M. (1975). The three-dimensional image of the lingual papillae. Folia Morphologica, 23(2), 145–159.
Veríssimo, C. J. (1993). Prejuízos causados pelo carrapato Boophilus microplus. Zootecnia, 31(3), 97–106.
Veríssimo, C. J., D’Agostino, S. M., Pessoa, F. F., Toledo, L. M., & Santos, I. K. F. M. (2015). Length and density of filiform tongue papillae: Differences between tick-susceptible and resistant cattle may affect tick loads. Parasites & Vectors, 8, Article 594. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1196-4
Copyright (c) 2026 Selma Marques D’Agostino, Fernanda Ferreira Pessoa, Luciandra Macedo de Toledo , Ricardo Lopes Dias da Costa, Luciana Morita Katiki, Francisco André Ossamu Tanaka, Cecília José Veríssimo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
DECLARAÇÃO DE ORIGINALIDADE E DIREITOS AUTORAIS
Declaro que o presente artigo é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação em qualquer outro periódico nacional ou internacional, quer seja em parte ou em sua totalidade.
Os direitos autorais pertencem exclusivamente aos autores. Os direitos de licenciamento utilizados pelo periódico é a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0): são permitidos o compartilhamento (cópia e distribuição do material em qualqer meio ou formato) e adaptação (remix, transformação e criação de material a partir do conteúdo assim licenciado para quaisquer fins, inclusive comerciais.
Recomenda-se a leitura desse link para maiores informações sobre o tema: fornecimento de créditos e referências de forma correta, entre outros detalhes cruciais para uso adequado do material licenciado.
Funding data
-
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Grant numbers 2011/08274-7 -
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Grant numbers 302089/2022-5 -
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Grant numbers 001






























