<b>Toxicity of the goji berry fruit associated with artificial excipients and dried without additives

  • Débora Dayane Araújo de Moura Universidade Federal do Piauí
  • Cleidiane Josefa dos Santos Veloso Universidade Federal do Piauí
  • Valtânia Ana de Oliveira Universidade Federal do Piauí
  • Maria Eduarda Sousa e Silva Universidade Federal do Piauí
  • Ana Paula Peron Universidade Federal do Piauí
Keywords: Lycium barbarum L., natural pharmaceutical product, cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, meristematic tissue.

Abstract

 

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of goji berry fruit-based pharmaceutical powders obtained from three pharmaceutical laboratories. The product A was tested at concentrations of 0.012; 0.025 and 0.05 g mL-1, and B and C at concentrations 0.02; 0.04 and 0.08 g mL-1. It was also evaluated the tea of the dried goji berry fruit (non-additives) in the concentrations 0.035; 0.07 and 0.14 g mL-1 for comparison to the results obtained with powdered goji berry. Tea concentrations in the two exposure times did not cause inhibition of cell division nor cellular alterations to meristem tissues. For the industrialized goji products, all concentrations analyzed caused significant antiproliferative effect to the tissues evaluated at the shortest time of analysis. There were no significant cellular changes in tissues exposed to industrialized goji. Therefore, under the conditions of analysis, goji berry powder, at the three concentrations evaluated, was cytotoxic to root meristems.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2018-07-01
How to Cite
Moura, D. D. A. de, Veloso, C. J. dos S., Oliveira, V. A. de, Silva, M. E. S. e, & Peron, A. P. (2018). <b&gt;Toxicity of the goji berry fruit associated with artificial excipients and dried without additives. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, 40(1), e37844. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v40i1.37844
Section
Biotechnology

 

0.6
2019CiteScore
 
 
31st percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.6
2019CiteScore
 
 
31st percentile
Powered by  Scopus