<b>Scientometric analysis of energetic ecology: primary production of aquatic macrophytes</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v31i4.5139
Abstract
The objective of this work was to perform a temporal quantitative analysis, using the scientometric technique, considering the number of citations that the terms Primary Production of Aquatic Macrophytesand Energetic Ecology received in a 50-year period (1956 to 2006). The study related 189 papers published in 26 magazines. It was verified that researchers of several nationalities are working on the proposed themes, with a predominance of those from developed countries (USA and Germany). In Brazil, production on these themes, although small, coincides with the results obtained for other themes analyzed using the same research technique. This fact indicates that greater efforts should be made in the search for more intense scientific production in the country, in the different areas of knowledge, especially in the object of this studyDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2009-08-20
How to Cite
Lolis, S. de F., Sanches-Marques, A. M. M., Arruda Reis, S. L., & Benedito, E. (2009). <b>Scientometric analysis of energetic ecology: primary production of aquatic macrophytes</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v31i4.5139. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, 31(4), 363-369. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v31i4.5139
Issue
Section
Ecology and Limnology
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.
0.6
2019CiteScore
31st percentile
Powered by 
0.6
2019CiteScore
31st percentile
Powered by 