<b>Testing hypotheses for morphological differences among populations of <i>Miconia sellowiana</i> (Melastomataceae) in southern Brazil</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v34i1.7580
Abstract
Micona sellowiana in different types of vegetation (Grassland, Montane Atlantic forest, Upper Montane Atlantic forest and Araucaria Pine forest). Although such variability could be due to phenotypic plasticity, an alternative explanation for this phenomenon is the existence of genetic differentiation among populations resulting from genetic drift or adaptation to different environments. The goal of the present study was to investigate the extent of genetic structures among populations of Miconia sellowiana using a neutral dominant genetic marker (RAPD - Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA). There was considerable variability in the studied samples, resulting in 96.5% polymorphic loci and a Gst = 0.13. The analysis of molecular variance showed the populations are genetically structured (p < 0.001). The subpopulations of M. sellowiana were grouped similarly together using genetic (based on a neutral marker) or morphological dendrograms, suggesting that the morphological differences observed are the result of local genetic differentiation by genetic drift and not the alleged phenotypic plasticity of the speciesDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2011-06-09
How to Cite
Pil, M. W., Torres Boeger, M. R., Pie, M., Goldenberg, R., Ostrensky, A., & Boeger, W. A. (2011). <b>Testing hypotheses for morphological differences among populations of <i>Miconia sellowiana</i> (Melastomataceae) in southern Brazil</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v34i1.7580. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, 34(1), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v34i1.7580
Issue
Section
Vegetable Morphology & Physiology
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.
0.6
2019CiteScore
31st percentile
Powered by 
0.6
2019CiteScore
31st percentile
Powered by 


1.png)



3.png)











