<b>Quantitative analysis of the influence of a new ecological paradigm: spatial autocorrelation</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v25i1.2113
Abstract
The aim of this paper was to evaluate the influence of the spatial autocorrelation (absence of independence among observations gathered along geographical space) in ecological studies. For this task, an evaluation of the studies that used spatial autocorrelation analysis was carried out using the data furnished by the Institute for Scientific Information. There is a positive temporal tendency in the number of studies that used spatial autocorrelation analysis. A significant autocorrelation was detected in most studies. Moreover, scientist of several nationalities carried out these studies in different countries, with different organisms and in different types of ecosystems. In this way, it is possible to consider that the explicit incorporation of the spatial structure of natural processes, through the autocorrelation analysis, is a new ecological paradigmDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-18
How to Cite
Pinto, M. P., Bini, L. M., & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. (2008). <b>Quantitative analysis of the influence of a new ecological paradigm: spatial autocorrelation</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v25i1.2113. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, 25(1), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v25i1.2113
Issue
Section
Biology Sciences
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.
0.6
2019CiteScore
31st percentile
Powered by 
0.6
2019CiteScore
31st percentile
Powered by 



1.png)



3.png)











