<b>Movement/deambulation on birthwork: a review</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascihealthsci.v26i2.1580

  • Fabiana Villela Mamede EERP / USP
  • Ana Maria de Almeida USP
  • Maria José Clapis USP

Abstract

The birth is not completely natural. This is because there are some attitudes and behavior controlled and culturally defined by society. It is physiologically better for the mother and for the baby if the mother keeps on movement during parturition. Based on these considerations, the aim of this work is to make a review about this subject in order to verify what theoretical articles consider about the effects of deambulation/liberty position and movement during the birthwork. The literature review showed that the vertical position has been the most used and preferred since the antiquity. It is because it causes less pain during birthwork and birth, decreases the birthwork and birth time limit. It improves the uterine contractility and offers more comfort to parturients. Also, it keeps the maternal-fetus-placental exchange for longer, decreasing the risk of fetal suffering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fabiana Villela Mamede, EERP / USP
Possui graduação em Enfermagem pela Universidade de São Paulo (1996), mestrado em Enfermagem em Saúde Pública pela Universidade de São Paulo (2000) e doutorado em Enfermagem em Saúde Pública pela Universidade de São Paulo (2005). Atualmente é professor doutor da Universidade de São Paulo. Tem experiência na área de Enfermagem, com ênfase em Enfermagem Obstétrica, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: educação, obstetrícia, genêro, enfermagem, infertilidade e planejamento familiar Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-03-31
How to Cite
Mamede, F. V., Almeida, A. M. de, & Clapis, M. J. (2008). <b>Movement/deambulation on birthwork: a review</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actascihealthsci.v26i2.1580. Acta Scientiarum. Health Sciences, 26(2), 295-302. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihealthsci.v26i2.1580
Section
Nursing

0.3
2019CiteScore
 
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.3
2019CiteScore
 
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus