Preliminary evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Luffa Operculata (L.) Cong. extracts

  • Nathalia Rodrigues Bulka Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
  • Ana Carolina Mendes Hacke Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
  • Valéria Gremski Pawlak Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
  • Romaiana Picada Pereira Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
  • Luis Antônio Esmerino Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
  • José Carlos Rebuglio Vellosa Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
Keywords: Buchinha do Norte; polyphenols; DPPH; ABTS; antimicrobial activity.

Abstract

Luffa operculata is a medicinal plant widely used in the treatment of rhinosinusitis in Brazil. The aim of this work was to carry out a preliminary analysis of the antioxidant and antimicrobial profile of Luffa operculata extracts. The antioxidant activity of the commercial solution, hydroalcoholic extract, infusion and ethanolic extract obtained from the commercialized fruit were evaluated for 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS•+) and 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals. The antimicrobial activity was determined by minimum inhibitory concentration against the pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans. It was shown that the hydroalcoholic extract exhibited the highest antioxidant and antimicrobial activity when compared to the aqueous and ethanolic extracts by the methods employed on this work. Thus, the extracts of Luffa operculata are a good source of active principles with pharmacological activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2020-07-03
How to Cite
Rodrigues Bulka, N., Hacke, A. C. M., Pawlak, V. G., Pereira, R. P., Esmerino, L. A., & Vellosa, J. C. R. (2020). Preliminary evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Luffa Operculata (L.) Cong. extracts. Acta Scientiarum. Health Sciences, 42(1), e50847. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihealthsci.v42i1.50847

0.3
2019CiteScore
 
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.3
2019CiteScore
 
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus