Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Urban Green Space Planning Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP and Aggregation Operators
Resumen
Urban green spaces are essential components of smart cities, contributing to environmental sustainability, public health, and social well-being. Selecting optimal locations for green space development requires balancing multiple, often conflicting criteria such as environmental impact, accessibility, cost, and maintenance requirements. To address the inherent uncertainty and subjectivity in such multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems, this study proposes a novel Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) integrated with advanced aggregation operators, namely Frank aggregation operators, Power Geometric operators, and the Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operator for robust criteria weighting and evaluation. The proposed framework combines Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP to effectively capture experts’ hesitancy and partial membership, while the aggregation operators enhance the expressiveness and flexibility of criteria synthesis under fuzziness. Subsequently, the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is applied to rank potential urban green space locations based on their relative closeness to the ideal solution. The Python-based experimental tool is utilized to implement and evaluate the proposed approach, ensuring reproducibility and computational efficiency. A case study conducted in a smart city context demonstrates superior performance and stability compared to conventional techniques.
Descargas
Citas
[2]. Chen, K., Zhang, T., Liu, F., Zhang, Y. and Song, Y., 2021. How does urban green space impact residents’ mental health: A literature review of mediators. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(22), p.11746.
[3]. Addas, A., 2023. Influence of urban green spaces on quality of life and health with smart city design. Land, 12(5), p.960.
[4]. Thorn, J.P., Maruza, T.C. and Stoffberg, M., 2025. Climate justice and informal trader's access to urban green spaces. Cities, 159, p.105725.
[5]. Sung, W.P., Liao, M.C., Peng, H.L., Huang, C.T., Chuang, Y.J. and Wang, J.J., 2025. The Role of Urban Food Forests in Promoting Environmental Sustainability and Public Health: A Focus on Temperature Regulation and Mental Health. Sustainability, 17(7), p.2875.
[6]. Russo, A., 2025. Towards Nature-Positive Smart Cities: bridging the gap between technology and ecology. Smart Cities, 8(1), p.26.
[7]. Vinczeová, Z. and Tóth, A., 2025. Urban Green Spaces and Collective Housing: Spatial Patterns and Ecosystem Services for Sustainable Residential Development. Sustainability, 17(6), p.2538.
[8]. Mudunuri, L.N.R. and Attaluri, V., 2025. Urban development challenges and the role of cloud AI-powered blue-green solutions. In Integrating Blue-Green Infrastructure Into Urban Development (pp. 507-522). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
[9]. Zhong, Q., Li, Z., Zhu, J. and Yuan, C., 2025. Revealing multiscale and nonlinear effects of urban green spaces on heat islands in high-density cities: Insights from MSPA and machine learning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 120, p.106173.
[10]. Thorn, J.P., Maruza, T.C. and Stoffberg, M., 2025. Climate justice and informal trader's access to urban green spaces. Cities, 159, p.105725.
[11]. Kiberet, B., Nebere, A., Workineh, B.A. and Jothimani, M., 2025. Integrating geospatial technologies and AHP for optimal urban green space development: a case study of Gondar, Ethiopia. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), p.303.
[12]. Basegmez, M. and Aydin, C.C., 2025. Climate change impact on green spaces planning in an urban area using a hybrid approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32(7), pp.4288-4312.
[13]. Jiang, C., Jiang, T., Zhu, B., Liu, W., Abbood, A.A.A. and Shafieezadeh, M.M., 2025. A comprehensive evaluation framework for green ecological urban underground space using factor analysis and AHP. Applied Water Science, 15(4), p.71.
[14]. Taufiqurrohman, M., Prasidha, I.N.T. and Juniati, A.T., 2025. Proposing a Land Suitability Analysis Method for Green Open Space in Nusantara Capital City. Jurnal Asiimetrik: Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa & Inovasi, pp.29-40.
[15]. Osséni, A.A., Gbesso, G.H.F., Yevide, S.I.A. and Godonou, E.R.A., 2024. Suitability Evaluation for Urban Green Space Areas in Sèmè-Podji District (Southern Benin), Using GIS and AHP Methods. Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 33.
[16]. Cui, Y., 2025. Investigation of urban land development and utilization using an intelligent AHP algorithm and decision support system. Scientific Reports, 15(1), p.19048.
[17]. Anjum, M., Min, H., Sharma, G. and Ahmed, Z., 2024. Advancing sustainable urban development: Navigating complexity with spherical fuzzy decision making. Symmetry, 16(6), p.670.
[18]. Romel, M. and Kabir, G., 2025. Prioritization of the Critical Factors of Hydrogen Transportation in Canada Using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP Method. Energies, 18(13), p.3318.
[19]. Yazdani, M., Ye, C., Shaayesteh, M.T. and Zaraté, P., 2025. Decision making model for waste management: fuzzy group AHP-CoCoSo. International Journal of Production Management & Engineering, 13(1).
[20]. Anjum, M., Kraiem, N., Min, H., Daradkeh, Y.I., Dutta, A.K. and Shahab, S., 2025. Integrating intuitionistic fuzzy and MCDM methods for sustainable energy management in smart factories. PLoS One, 20(1), p.e0315251.
[21]. Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., El Barakaz, F., Lachgar, M., Assad, N., Rustam, F. and Ashraf, I., 2021. An intuitionistic fuzzy approach for smart city development evaluation for developing countries: Moroccan context. Mathematics, 9(21), p.2668.
[22]. Bačić, S., Tomić, H., Rogulj, K. and Andlar, G., 2024. Fuzzy decision-making valuation model for urban green infrastructure implementation. Energies, 17(20), p.5162.
[23]. Tran, N.T., Trinh, V.L. and Chung, C.K., 2024. An integrated approach of fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in industrial robot selection. Processes, 12(8), p.1723.
[24]. Mahajan, R., Baidya, A., Majumder, P. and Bera, U.K., 2025. A novel hybrid spherical fuzzy AHP-SWARA-CoCoSo based group decision-making approach and their application in evaluating women empowerment policies. Sādhanā, 50(3), p.118.
[25]. Nomura, L.M.N., Bressane, A., Monteiro, V.V., de Oliveira, I.V.B., Ruas, G., Negri, R.G. and da Silva, A.M., 2025. Identifying Priority Areas for Planning Urban Green Infrastructure: A Fuzzy Artificial Intelligence-Based Framework. Urban Science, 9(4), p.126.
[26]. Chakraborty, A., Mondal, S.P., Alam, S. and Dey, A., 2021. Classification of trapezoidal bipolar neutrosophic number, de-bipolarization technique and its execution in cloud service-based MCGDM problem. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(1), pp.145-162.
[27]. Piasecki, K. and Łyczkowska-Hanćkowiak, A., 2021. Oriented fuzzy numbers vs. fuzzy numbers. Mathematics, 9(5), p.523.
[28]. Yahya, M., Naeem, M., Abdullah, S., Qiyas, M. and Aamir, M., 2021. A Novel Approach on the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rough Frank Aggregation Operator‐Based EDAS Method for Multicriteria Group Decision‐Making. Complexity, 2021(1), p.5534381.
[29]. Huang, Z., Weng, S., Lv, Y. and Liu, H., 2023. Ranking method of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and multiple attribute decision making based on the probabilistic dominance relationship. Symmetry, 15(5), p.1001.
[30]. Chen, X., Fang, Y., Chai, J. and Xu, Z., 2022. Does intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process work better than analytic hierarchy process?. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(2), pp.909-924.
Derechos de autor 2026 Boletim da Sociedade Paranaense de Matemática

Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0.
When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree automatically to transfer the copyright to the (SPM).
The journal utilize the Creative Common Attribution (CC-BY 4.0).



