Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Rough Soft Set Based Intelligent Decision-Making Framework for Water Quality Assessment

  • AJOY KANT DAS Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, ICV-College.
  • Nandini Gupta
  • Rajat Das
  • Rajib Mallik
  • Suman Das

Resumen

This study introduces a novel framework, Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Rough Soft Sets (IVNRSSs), designed to improve handling uncertainty, imprecision, and vagueness in complex decision-making scenarios. By integrating soft, rough, and interval-valued neutrosophic set theories, the framework offers a robust methodology for addressing indeterminacy and incomplete data. The theoretical foundation of IVNRSSs is built upon fundamental operations, including intersection, union, complement, and novel aggregation union operators tailored for multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) applications. The practical applicability of the framework is demonstrated through a water quality assessment, where it successfully classifies river segments based on key water quality parameters such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen (DO), and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD). The study results show that the pollution scores for the river segments were computed, classifying the segments such as "Good," "Moderate," and "Poor," with corresponding pollution levels. These findings highlight the framework's ability to manage incomplete and inconsistent data, providing a reliable and comprehensive water quality evaluation. Compared to traditional models, the IVNRSS approach offers enhanced flexibility, stability, and adaptability. This study not only contributes to the theoretical development of neutrosophic, soft, and rough set theories but also establishes IVNRSSs as a powerful tool for water quality decision-making. Future research will explore further advancements in the application and computational efficiency of this framework.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

References:
1. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965; 8(3): 338-353.
2. Atanassov K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1986; 20(1): 87-96.
3. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences. 1982; 11(5): 341-356.
4. Molodtsov D. Soft set theory: First results. Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 1999; 37(4–5): 19–31.
5. Smarandache F. A unifying field in logics: Neutrosophy: Neutrosophic probability, set, and logic. Rehoboth: American Research Press; 1998.
6. Smarandache F. Neutrosophic set: A generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 2005; 24: 287-297.
7. Broumi S, Smarandache F. Interval-valued neutrosophic rough sets. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems. 2015; 7: 23-31.
8. Mukherjee A, Das R. Generalized interval-valued neutrosophic set and its application. Transactions of Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2025; 4(2). https://doi.org/10.71602/tfss.2025.1130042.
9. WHO. Guidelines for drinking water quality. 4th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.
10. CPCB. Guidelines for Water Quality Management, Central Pollution Control Board, Delhi, 2008.
11. Salama AA, Alblowi SA. Generalized neutrosophic set and generalized neutrosophic topological spaces. Computer Science and Engineering. 2012; 2(7): 129-132. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.computer.20120207.01.
12. Broumi S, Smarandache F, Dhar M. Rough neutrosophic sets. Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 2014; 32: 493-502.
13. Broumi S, Smarandache F. Interval-valued neutrosophic soft rough sets. International Journal of Computational Mathematics. 2015; Article ID 232919, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/232919.
14. Yang H-L, Bao Y-L, Guo Z-L. Generalized interval neutrosophic rough sets and its application in multi-attribute decision making. Filomat. 2018; 32(1): 11–33. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1801011Y.
15. Saha A, Broumi S. New operators on interval-valued neutrosophic sets. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems. 2019; 28(1): 128-137. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss_journal/vol28/iss1/10.
16. Sahoo B, Debnath BK. A novel hybrid spherical fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach to select the best hydroelectric power plant source in India. Renewable Energy Focus. 2024; 51(16):100650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2024.100650
17. Saha, A., Majumder, P., Dutta, D. et al. Multi-attribute decision making using q-rung orthopair fuzzy weighted fairly aggregation operators. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 12, 8149–8171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02551-5
18. Saha A, Mishra AR, Rani P, et al. An optimization model-based DEA-MARCOS approach for assessing EU countries towards achieving sustainable development goals. Environmental Science &. 2024; Policy, 162, 103913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103913.
19. Sahoo B, Debnath BK. Select the Best Place for Regenerative Practices in Tourism by Using the Fuzzy MABAC Method. In Building Community Resiliency and Sustainability with Tourism Development. 2024 (pp. 261-285). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5405-6.ch012.
20. Saha A, Debnath BK, Chatterjee P, et al. Generalized Dombi-based probabilistic hesitant fuzzy consensus reaching model for supplier selection under healthcare supply chain framework. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,133(3):107966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.107966.
21. Das AK, Gupta N, Mahmood T, et al. An innovative fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for analyzing anthropogenic influences on urban river water quality. Iran Journal of Computer Science. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42044-024-00211-x.
22. Das AK, Gupta N, Mahmood T, et al. Assessing anthropogenic influences on the water quality of Gomati River using an innovative weighted fuzzy soft set-based water pollution rating system. Discover Water. 2024; 4: 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-024-00136-3.
23. Das, A.K., Gupta, N., Patra, S., Tripathy, B.C., Das, R., Datta, R. (2025). An effective fuzzy soft decision-making model for rating water pollution: A case study of Manu, the longest river in Tripura, India, Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology.
24. Das, A.K., Das, R., Das, S., Debnath, B.K., Granados, C., Shil, B., Das, R. (2025). A Comprehensive Study of Neutrosophic SuperHyper BCI-Semigroups and Their Algebraic Significance,Transactions on Fuzzy Sets and Systems
25. Das, A. K., Gupta, N., Mahmood, T., Tripathy, B. C., Das, R., & Das, S. (2025). An efficient water quality evaluation model using weighted hesitant fuzzy soft sets for water pollution rating. In A. Kumar, P. Kumar, S. Rathee, & B. Kumar (Eds.), Mechatronics: Concepts, Tools, Applications, and New Trends (1st ed., p. 17). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003494478
Publicado
2025-09-17
Sección
Research Articles