Accelerating MHD shock predictions using deep learning surrogate neural networks trained on finite difference solutions

Abstract

Cylindrically converging magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) shock waves in non-ideal gases exhibit complex interactions between compressibility, magnetic field effects, and real-gas thermodynamics. These flows are governed by a system of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) derived through similarity transformation from the conservation laws in cylindrical geometry. In this work, we focus on the specific case where the gas obeys the Van der Waals equation of state (EOS), as studied in \cite{revathi2025similarity}. We first implement a finite difference (FD) scheme to numerically solve the resulting similarity ODEs over a broad range of physical parameters, including the adiabatic index \(\gamma\), magnetic field strength coefficient \(C_0\), and Van der Waals constants \(a_1\) and \(b_1\). The computed solutions serve as the training data for a fully connected deep neural network that learns to map inputs \((\xi, \gamma, C_0, a_1, b_1)\) directly to the shock profile variables \((\rho, u, p, h, E)\). The trained surrogate model achieves excellent predictive accuracy, with \(R^2 > 0.99998\) and RMSE \(< 10^{-3}\) across all output variables. Compared to traditional numerical solvers, the neural network enables orders-of-magnitude faster evaluations while retaining physical fidelity. This work demonstrates a robust and efficient surrogate modeling strategy for accelerating MHD shock predictions in non-ideal gases, enabling rapid parametric studies and real-time deployment in computational MHD applications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Revathi and A. Ramu, Similarity solution to cylindrically converging symmetric magneto hydrodynamic (MHD) shock in a non-ideal gas with total energy, Discontinuity Nonlinearity Complex. 14(1), 215–225, (2025).

R. Courant and K. O. Friedrichs, Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves, Springer, (1999).

Ya. B. Zeldovich and Yu. P. Raizer, Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena, Dover, (2002).

L. I. Sedov, Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics, CRC Press, (1993).

R. F. Chisnell, The motion of a shock wave in a channel, J. Fluid Mech. 2(3), 286–298, (1957).

G. B. Whitham, On the propagation of shock waves through regions of non-uniform area or flow, J. Fluid Mech. 4(4), 337–360, (1958).

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Pergamon Press, (1980).

P. A. Thompson, Compressible-Fluid Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, (1971).

S. Bhardwaj, S. R. Mata, N. Apazidis and M. Liverts, Influence of flow nonuniformities and real gas effects on cylindrical shock wave convergence, Phys. Fluids 36(12), (2024).

M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear PDEs, J. Comput. Phys. 378, 686–707, (2019).

T. Kim, Y. Ha and M. Kang, Neural operators learn the local physics of magnetohydrodynamics, Comput. Fluids, 106661, (2025).

Y. Bar-Sinai, S. Hoyer, J. Hickey and M. P. Brenner, Learning data-driven discretizations for partial differential equations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(31), 15344–15349, (2019).

J. Han, A. Jentzen and W. E, Solving high-dimensional PDEs using deep learning, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(34), 8505–8510, (2018).

S. Bhatnagar, Y. Afshar, S. Pan, K. Duraisamy and S. Kaushik, Prediction of aerodynamic flow fields using convolutional neural networks, Comput. Mech. 64(2), 525–545, (2019).

X. Cheng, P. C. H. Nguyen, P. K. Seshadri, M. Verma, Z. J. Gray, J. T. Beerman, H. S. Udaykumar and S. S. Baek, Physics-aware recurrent convolutional neural networks for modeling multiphase compressible flows, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 177, 104877, (2024).

Published
2025-09-30
Section
Advances in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications