<b>Performance of a microtractor using engines with different energetic alternatives</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v28i1.1286
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v28i1.1286Keywords:
energia, motores, patinagemAbstract
This study evaluated the performance of a microtractor implemented in three different operational types. A microtractor chassis was alternately operated with a three-phase electric engine (MCA), a direct-current electric engine (MCC) and an internal combustion engine (MCI). The rehearsals of the microtractor implemented in each one of the engines allowed determinations of the maximum tractive force, the forward speed and the fuel consumption in wheel skiddings. The MCC developed greater snatch force, being 22% superior to the others. The specific consumption on energy for the microtractors decreased as the skiddings increased.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2008-03-20
How to Cite
Rodrigues, D. E., Teixeira, M. M., Fernandes, H. C., Modolo, A. J., & Rodrigues, G. J. (2008). <b>Performance of a microtractor using engines with different energetic alternatives</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v28i1.1286. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 28(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v28i1.1286
Issue
Section
Electrical Engineering
License
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.
0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by


0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by 