<b>Quantification of the major bioactive phytochemicals in the gabiroba (<i>Campomanesia xanthocarpa</i> Berg) juice</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.13910

Authors

  • Marli da Silva Santos Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Mato Grosso
  • Carlos Henrique Correia Centro de Ensino Superior dos Campos Gerais
  • Carmen Lucia de Oliveira Petkowicz Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • Lys Mary Bileski Cândido Universidade Federal do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.13910

Keywords:

gabiroba, juice, phytochemicals, bioactivity

Abstract

The juice was evaluated regarding yield, turbidity, physicochemical characteristics and acceptability. In order to check the acceptability, three samples were prepared by adding sucrose until reaching 12, 14 and 16°Brix, respectively, once this is the characteristic range of commercial samples for ready-made juices. The use of enzymes increased the juice yield, which showed a good retention of bioactive compounds. The sample with the highest overall acceptance was that of 14°Brix with a overall average of eight, corresponding to the expression `I liked it very much´, suggesting a high market potential.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carmen Lucia de Oliveira Petkowicz, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Paraná

Lys Mary Bileski Cândido, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Technological Federal University of Paraná, Francisco Beltrão Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Paraná

Published

2013-05-22

How to Cite

Santos, M. da S., Correia, C. H., Petkowicz, C. L. de O., & Cândido, L. M. B. (2013). <b>Quantification of the major bioactive phytochemicals in the gabiroba (<i>Campomanesia xanthocarpa</i> Berg) juice</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.13910. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 35(4), 783–787. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.13910

Issue

Section

Food Technology

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus