CAP_USO: an expert system to determine land use capability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v21i0.3090Keywords:
sistemas especialistas, capacidade de uso, planejamento de uso da terraAbstract
The objective of this paper was to develop an expert system (CAP_USO) to determine the land use capability in order to aid and speed up the decision-making process in land use planning. The system was developed by using CLIPS (C Language Integrated Production System), an expert system designed by NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). The slope and twelve other factors that limit the land use were considered in order to determine the land capability. The validation of the system showed that the CAP_USO was rigorous to determine the land capability because it considers the slope and takes into account other factors that present major restrictions to the land use. The technique for expert systems showed to be efficient to determine land capability, which facilitates the manipulation and the processing of the necessary information.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2008-05-14
How to Cite
Giboshi, M. L., Rodrigues, L. H. A., & Lombardi Neto, F. (2008). CAP_USO: an expert system to determine land use capability. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 21, 909–914. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v21i0.3090
Issue
Section
Geography
License
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.
0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by


0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by 