Bioenergy Recovery in Full-Scale Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine Wastewater and Pig Bedding Material

Henrique Vieira de  Mendonça; Mônica Silva dos  Santos

doi:10.4025/actascitechnol.v48i1.75183

Authors

Henrique Vieira de Mendonça Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-5110
Mônica Silva dos Santos Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2661-6660

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v48i1.75183

Keywords:

Bioenergy; Bioresource; Resource recovery; Sustainability; Swine farming.

Abstract

Pig farming represents a rapidly expanding segment of Brazil’s agricultural sector, concomitant with the generation of substantial volumes of wastewater, the effective management of which demands strategic solutions. Anaerobic digestion has been identified as a promising solution for the preliminary treatment of these effluents, concurrently yielding methane-rich biogas, which possesses the capability to generate thermal or electrical energy. This study evaluates a new anaerobic treatment method, through the co-digestion of swine wastewater (SWW) and bedding material (BM) on a real scale, changing the production of bioenergy. The experiment was divided into four phases: Phase 1, monitoring the biodigester operating solely with swine wastewater (SWW); Phase 2, application of SWW + 2 tonnes of BM (SWW+2 T); Phase 3, SWW + 6 tonnes of BM (SWW + 6 T); and Phase 4, SWW + 10 tonnes of BM (SWW+10 T). Loads of 320 ( ± 2.3) to 805 ( ± 18) kg COD d?¹ in the summer and from 310 ( ± 1.5) to 780 ( ± 13) kg COD d?¹ in the winter were applied. The concentrations of methane and CO? were measured by gas chromatography. Biogas productions three times higher were recorded when 12 tons of BM were applied, which, when converted into bioenergy potential, resulted in the generation of 635 kWh per day of bioenergy in the summer and 270 kWh per day in the winter. Methane yield was highest in the summer with the application of 12 tons of BM (0.34 m^{3 K}gCOD_Rem^?1). Volatile solids and COD removals ranged between 60-70% and 61-84%, respectively. The findings highlight that the use of deep bedding alongside SWW contributes significantly to biogas production, and co-digestion is recommended to enhance electricity generation on farms, with the added benefit of treating two waste types in a single reactor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahn, Y., Lee, W., Kang, S., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Enhancement of sewage sludge digestion by co-digestion with food waste and swine waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11(5), 2421–2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-00558-w

Ajay, C. M., Mohan, S., Dinesha, P., & Rosen, M. A. (2020). Review of impact of nanoparticle additives on anaerobic digestion and methane generation. Fuel, 277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118234

Antonelli, J., Lindino, A., Rodrigues De Azevedo, J. C., Nelson, S., De Souza, M., Cremonez, P. A., & Rossi, E. (2016). Biogas production by the anaerobic digestion of whey. Revista de Ciências Agrárias, 39(3), 463–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.19084/RCA15115

APHA, AWWA, & WEF. (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (22nd ed.). American Public Health Association.

Atelge, M. R., Atabani, A. E., Banu, J. R., Krisa, D., Kaya, M., Eskicioglu, C., Kumar, G., Lee, C., Yildiz, Y., Unalan, S., Mohanasundaram, R., & Duman, F. (2020). A critical review of pretreatment technologies to enhance anaerobic digestion and energy recovery. Fuel, 270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117494

Banerjee, S., Prasad, N., & Selvaraju, S. (2022). Reactor design for biogas production—A short review. Journal of Energy and Power Technology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21926/jept.2201004

Cândido, D., Bolsan, A. C., Hollas, C. E., Venturi, B., Tápparo, D. C., Bonassa, G., Antes, F. G., Steinmetz, R. L. R., Bortoli, M., & Kunz, A. (2022). Integration of swine manure anaerobic digestion and digestate nutrients removal/recovery under a circular economy concept. Journal of Environmental Management, 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113825

Castano, J. M., Martin, J. F., & Ciotola, R. (2014). Performance of a small-scale, variable temperature fixed dome digester in a temperate climate. Energies, 7(9), 5701–5716. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7095701

Cho, S. K., Im, W. T., Kim, D. H., Kim, M. H., Shin, H. S., & Oh, S. E. (2013). Dry anaerobic digestion of food waste under mesophilic conditions: Performance and methanogenic community analysis. Bioresource Technology, 131, 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.148

Costa, G. S. da, & Marvulli, M. V. N. (2020). Soluções alternativas para o tratamento, disposição ou reutilização de dejetos animais provenientes de atividade suinícola no Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research, 3(3), 1471–1479. https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv3n3-063

D’Aquino, C. A., de Mello, T. C., & Júnior, L. C. (2019). The effect of organic loading rate’s natural variation on the biogas yields from swine manure digestion at different hydraulic retention time. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, 24(3), 613–617. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-41522019124926

de Mendonça, H. V., Martins, C. E., Rocha, W. S. D., Borges, C. A. V., Ometto, J. P. H. B., & Otenio, M. H. (2018). Biofertilizer replace urea as a source of nitrogen for sugarcane production. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-3874-2

de Mendonça, H. V., Ometto, J. P. H. B., & Otenio, M. H. (2017). Production of energy and biofertilizer from cattle wastewater in farms with intensive cattle breeding. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3264-1

de Mendonça, H. V., Ometto, J. P. H. B., Otenio, M. H., Delgado Dos Reis, A. J., & Marques, I. P. R. (2017). Bioenergy recovery from cattle wastewater in an UASB-AF hybrid reactor. Water Science and Technology, 76(8), 2268–2279. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.325

de Mendonça, H. V., Otenio, M. H., & Paula, V. R. (2021). Anaerobic digestion for the production of renewable energy. Revista em Agronegócio e Meio Ambiente, 14(3), e7667. https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2021v14n3e7667

de Souza, D. S., Maciel, A. M., Otenio, M. H., & de Mendonça, H. V. (2020). Optimization of ozone application in post-treatment of cattle wastewater from organic farms. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04736-2

Deng, C., Lin, R., Kang, X., Wu, B., Wall, D. M., & Murphy, J. D. (2021). What physicochemical properties of biochar facilitate interspecies electron transfer in anaerobic digestion: A case study of digestion of whiskey by-products. Fuel, 306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121736

Egwu, U., Sallis, P., & Oko, E. (2021). Study of the impacts of supplements on the specific methane production during anaerobic digestion of the West African Gamba and Guinea Grass. Fuel, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119060

Elihimas, D. R. M., de Mendonça, G. F., Cavalcanti, C. J. S., Ravagnani, M. A. S. S., Costa, C. B. B., Simoes, D. A., Gavazza, S., & Fernandes, B. S. (2025). Towards biogas production from vinasse and pentose liquor from sugarcane biorefineries. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100925

Grady, C. P. L., Jr., & Lim, H. C. (1980). Biological waste treatment. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Jameel, M. K., Mustafa, M. A., Ahmed, H. S., Mohammed, A. J., Ghazy, H., Shakir, M. N., Lawas, A. M., Mohammed, S. K., Idan, A. H., Mahmoud, Z. H., Sayadi, H., & Kianfar, E. (2024). Biogas: Production, properties, applications, economic and challenges: A review. Results in Chemistry, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2024.101549

Kothari, R., Pandey, A. K., Kumar, S., Tyagi, V. V., & Tyagi, S. K. (2014). Different aspects of dry anaerobic digestion for bio-energy: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 174–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.011

Leite, P. F. A. F., Vich, D. V., & Callado, N. H. (2021). Tratamento de dejetos de suinocultura em reator anaeróbio com pós-tratamento aeróbio/anóxico. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, 26(3), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-415220200009

Lin, W. C., Chen, Y. P., & Tseng, C. P. (2013). Pilot-scale chemical-biological system for efficient H2S removal from biogas. Bioresource Technology, 135, 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.040

Matos, A. T. (2014). Tratamento e aproveitamento agrícola de resíduos sólidos. Editora UFV.

Monou, M., Pafitis, N., Kythreotou, N., Smith, S. R., Mantzavinos, D., & Kassinos, D. (2008). Anaerobic co-digestion of potato processing wastewater with pig slurry and abattoir wastewater. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 83(12), 1658–1667. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2000

Nascimento, A. M., Maciel, A. M., Silva, J. B. G., Mendonça, H. V., Paula, V. R., & Otenio, M. H. (2020). Biofertilizer application on corn (Zea mays) increases the productivity and quality of the crop without causing environmental damage. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04778-6

Nguyen, V. K., Chaudhary, D. K., Dahal, R. H., Trinh, N. H., Kim, J., Chang, S. W., Hong, Y., La Duc, D., Nguyen, X. C., Ngo, H. H., Chung, W. J., & Nguyen, D. D. (2021). Review on pretreatment techniques to improve anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Fuel, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119105

Niu, D. J., Huang, H., Dai, X. H., & Zhao, Y. C. (2013). Greenhouse gases emissions accounting for typical sewage sludge digestion with energy utilization and residue land application in China. Waste Management, 33(1), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.06.022

Prabhu, A. V., Raja, S. A., Avinash, A., & Pugazhendhi, A. (2021). Parametric optimization of biogas potential in anaerobic co-digestion of biomass wastes. Fuel, 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119574

Qin, W., Han, S., Meng, F., Chen, K., Gao, Y., Li, J., Lin, L., Hu, E., & Jiang, J. (2024). Impacts of seasonal variation on volatile fatty acids production of food waste anaerobic fermentation. Science of The Total Environment, 912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168764

Riaño, B., Molinuevo, B., & García-González, M. C. (2011). Potential for methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with winery wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 102(5), 4131–4136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.077

Rockenbach, F. L., Souza, A. M., & Oliveira, J. H. R. de. (2016). Economic feasibility of biogas production in swine farms using time series analysis. Ciência Rural, 46(7), 1295–1300. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20141848

Rodrigues, L. S., Torres, E. P., Rodrigues, L. A., Dutra, J. da C. F., Sampaio, R. R., & Silva, I. J. da. (2020). Aplicabilidade de sistema reator anaeróbio compartimentado seguida de filtro anaeróbio no tratamento de efluentes de suinocultura de pequeno porte. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, 25(3), 451–456. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-41522020137661

Singh, N., Gautam, Y., Balakrishnan, M., & Basu, S. (2021). Separation of lignin from pulp and paper mill wastewater using forward osmosis process. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47(7), 1423–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.435

Singh, R. K., Tiwari, G. N., & Sinha, A. S. K. (2025). Thermal modelling of semitransparent photovoltaic thermal and flat plate collector integrated biogas plant for slurry heating: An experimental validation. Renewable Energy, 241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122778

Sousa, F. A., Campos, A. T., Ivo, P., Amaral, S., & Veloso, A. V. (2017). Produção de biogás proveniente de camas sobrepostas de suínos. Energia na Agricultura, 32(3), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.17224/EnergAgric.2017v32n3p229-236

Tait, S., Tamis, J., Edgerton, B., & Batstone, D. J. (2009). Anaerobic digestion of spent bedding from deep litter piggery housing. Bioresource Technology, 100(7), 2210–2218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.10.032

Wu, W., Cheng, L. C., & Chang, J. S. (2020). Environmental life cycle comparisons of pig farming integrated with anaerobic digestion and algae-based wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Management, 264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110512

Vieira de Mendonça, H., & Silva dos Santos, M. (2022). Co-digestion of deep bedding and wastewater from pig farming: A new strategy for bioenergy increase and biofertilizer recovery. Journal of Environmental Management, 304, 114310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114310

Yang, H., Guo, Y., Fang, N., & Dong, B. (2023). Life cycle assessment of sludge anaerobic digestion combined with land application treatment route: Greenhouse gas emission and reduction potential. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.111255