Natural factors affecting the whitefly infestation on cassava
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of predators, parasitoids, leaf chemical composition and levels of leaf nitrogen and potassium, total rainfall, mean temperature, sunlight and relative humidity on the attack rate of the whitefly Aleurothrixus aepim (Goeldi) on the cassava plants Manihot esculenta Crantz. It was observed a negative correlation between nymphs of whitefly and mean temperature and nymphs and adults with total rainfall. There were observed relationships between Aelothripidae with eggs, nymphs and adults of whitefly; Encarsia sp., spider Araneidae and Syrphidae with adults of whitefly; and Hyaliodes vitreus with nymphs of whitefly. Ants of the genus Crematogaster were observed associated to nymphs of this whitefly. The peaks 25.503 and 47.763min. (retention time) correlated with whitefly adults. Even though different factors, such as ecological and physiological conditions of plants, besides parasitoids and predators, can affect population fluctuation of the whitefly; the most important one for this insect seems to be the plant phenology (leaf senescense).Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-23
How to Cite
Leite, G. L. D., Picanço, M., Zanuncio, J. C., & Gusmão, M. R. (2008). Natural factors affecting the whitefly infestation on cassava. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 25(2), 291-297. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v25i2.1780
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 