Nutritional limitations of imbuzeiro seedlings growth in distrofic Red Latossol in the North of Minas Gerais State, Brazil
Abstract
Spondias tuberosa is an alternative tree fruit to be economically explored, under dry conditions in the North of Minas Gerais, Brazil. However, it is necessary more information about its rational cultivation and mainly its mineral nutrition limitations. This work was carried out to evaluate the mineral nutrient required by Spondias tuberosa plant growth. The seedlings were cultivated in pots of Brazilian Oxisol under the following treatments: a complete treatment (fertilized with N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, B and Zn), a control one (natural soil) and the absence of those nutrients per pot treatment. Plant height, stem diameter, dry matter of shoot, root and xilopode and the nutrient content in dry matter of shoots were evaluated after four months. The results of analysis showed that the imbuzeiro demanded a lot of nutrient in appropriate humidity conditions. The natural soil studied presented low nutrient contents demanded by the Spondias tuberosa during this growing phase.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-11
How to Cite
Silva, E. de B., Gonçalves, N. P., & Pinho, P. J. de. (2008). Nutritional limitations of imbuzeiro seedlings growth in distrofic Red Latossol in the North of Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 27(1), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v27i1.1923
Issue
Section
Soils and Plant Nutrition
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 