Evaluation of Mombaça grass (<em>Panicum maximum</em> Jacq.) under two different nitrogen rates

  • Karina Rocha Freitas CEFET-RV
  • Beneval Rosa UFG
  • Juliana Azevedo Ruggiero UFG
  • Jorge Luiz do Nascimento UFG
  • Alexandre Bryan Heinemam EMBRAPA
  • Paulo Henrique Ferreira UFG
  • Rafaela Macedo UFG

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of different rates of N on dry matter production of Mombaça grass (Panicum maximum Jacq.), the efficiency of nitrogen conversion and nutrient concentration contained in plant tissue . Four rates of N were used (70, 140, 210 and 280 kg/ha/year) as Urea form. The evaluation period was from November of 2002 to April of 2003, when six cuts of 28 days intervals and 30 cm high from the soil were accomplished. The statistical design used was a completely randomized block, in split spot parcel in time, with eight replications. Scott-Knott test was used for average comparison. The best dry matter productions were obtained with application of 280 kg of N/ha. The highest efficiencies of the conversion were verified by the application of the lower doses of N.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Karina Rocha Freitas, CEFET-RV
Possui graduação em ZOOTECNIA pela Universidade Católica de Goiás (2001), Mestrado em Ciência Animal pela Universidade Federal de Goiás (2004) e Doutorado em Ciência Animal pela Universidade Federal de Goiás, sua tese teve como tema: "Avaliação do capim Mombaça irrigado e adubado com dejetos líquidos de suínos". Tem experiência na área de Zootecnia, com ênfase em Produção Animal e Forragicultura Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-04-11
How to Cite
Freitas, K. R., Rosa, B., Ruggiero, J. A., Nascimento, J. L. do, Heinemam, A. B., Ferreira, P. H., & Macedo, R. (2008). Evaluation of Mombaça grass (<em>Panicum maximum</em&gt; Jacq.) under two different nitrogen rates. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 27(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v27i1.2154
Section
Soils and Plant Nutrition

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus