Use of AVHRR/NOAA-14 multi-temporal data to evaluate soil degradation
Abstract
This paper presents a methodology for the use of AVHRR/NOAA-14 (Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) sensor data in USLE (universal soil loss equation) for the identification of soil degradation and the mapping of erosion risks at regional level. To apply USLE equation, remote sensing and GIS (Geographic Information System) techniques were used to define sugarcane plantation areas. NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) data acquired from seven different AVHRR images were transformed from gray scale levels to percent of reflectance, because reflectance data are more adequate to get NDVI values. A linear correlation analysis was performed between soil losses ratio and the age of sugarcane to derive the factor C (land use and management) which indicates the soil protection provided by the vegetative cover and it changes gradually as the amount of biomass increases. NDVI data derived from AVHRR/NOAA-14 images were adequate to characterize biomass increase in sugarcane plantations in a 16-month period covering two harvestsDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-05-08
How to Cite
Cavalli, A. C., Lombardi Neto, F., Garcia, G. J., & Zullo Junior, J. (2008). Use of AVHRR/NOAA-14 multi-temporal data to evaluate soil degradation. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 22, 1037-1043. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v22i0.2849
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 







































