<b>Sulfur effect by simulated acid rain on morphophysiological parameters of the bean plant</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4273

  • Bruna Borba Dias Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Maysa de Lima Leite Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Paraná
  • Paulo Vitor Farago Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Paraná
  • André Vicente de Oliveira Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Paraná
  • Gustavo Castilho Beruski Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Paraná
Keywords: Phaseolus vulgaris, acid rain, sulfur, chlorophyll, epidermal annexes

Abstract

The goal of this work was to evaluate the effects of sulfur and simulated acid rain on the leaf of Phaseolus vulgaris. Acid rain (pH 3.0) and an aqueous solution (Ph 6.0) were performed on test and control plants, respectively. A decrease in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll concentrations was observed in the flowering stage (R6). However, increased rates were determined in the maturation stage (R7), which can suggest a resistance and/or adjustment of the plants to the acid simulation conditions. The acid treatment achieved chlorophyll degradation by oxidative processes without conversion to pheophytin. A reduction was also seen in the number of glandular and non-glandular trichomes and stomata on the test plants. Moreover, only small injuries were verified on the blade and peciolar areas of the tested individuals of P. vulgaris, probably due to the presence of the reported epidermal structures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bruna Borba Dias, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2973968939993620
Published
2010-08-25
How to Cite
Dias, B. B., Leite, M. de L., Farago, P. V., Oliveira, A. V. de, & Beruski, G. C. (2010). <b>Sulfur effect by simulated acid rain on morphophysiological parameters of the bean plant</b&gt; - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4273. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 32(3), 433-439. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4273
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus