Comparison between evaluation methods of bean cultivars adaptability and stability

  • Glauco Vieira Miranda UFV
  • Clibas Vieira UFV
  • Cosme Damião Cruz UFV
  • Geraldo Antônio de Andrade Araújo UFV

Abstract

This study compares evaluation methods of cultivar adaptability and stability in bean production (Phaseolus vulgaris). Two different groups of methods were used: the first based on simple linear regressions by Finlay and Wilkinson (1963), Eberhart and Russell (1966) and Tai (1971); and the second based on non-linear regressions by Verma et al. (1978) and Cruz et al. (1989). The results showed contradictions between Finlay and Wilkinson’s method and the others, but showed perfect correlafion between Eberhart and Russell’s method and Tai’s. The method of Cruz et al. showed to be more adequate, than the one of Verma et al. All the methods, except Finlay and Wilkinson’s, led to the same results as for cultivars adaptability and stability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Glauco Vieira Miranda, UFV
GLAUCO VIEIRA MIRANDA obteve o título de Doctor Scientiae em Genética e Melhoramento pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) em 1998. Realizou o pós-doutorado em transformação de plantas de milho na University of Illinois em 2006/7. É Professor Associado da UFV desde 1997. Os primeiros 10 anos do programa de pesquisa foram dedicados exclusivamente à cultura do milho consolidando a linha de pesquisa MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS PARA ESTRESSES ABIÓTICOS utilizando o estado-da-arte da seleção recorrente, genética quantitativa e biotecnologia (PCR e transformação).
Published
2008-07-14
How to Cite
Miranda, G. V., Vieira, C., Cruz, C. D., & Araújo, G. A. de A. (2008). Comparison between evaluation methods of bean cultivars adaptability and stability. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 20, 249-255. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v20i0.4363
Section
Agronomy

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus