<b>Induction of rooting in cuttings of <em>Malvaviscus arboreus</em> Cav. with different concentrations of Indolbutiric Acid (IBA)</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i2.799

  • Arcângelo Loss UFRRJ
  • Michelle Barbosa Teixeira UFRRJ
  • Tiago de Jesus Santos UFRRJ
  • Vicente Martins Gomes UENF
  • Lydia Huguenim Queiroz UFRRJ
Keywords: Malvaceae, propagation, growth regulator

Abstract

The study evaluated the effect of three concentrations of auxin (0; 2,000 and 6,000 ppm) (indolbutiric acid - IBA) in inducing the formation of adventitious roots in three types of stem stakes (herbaceous, woody and semi-woody) of wax mallow (Malvaviscus arboreus Cav.). The stakes were cut into a bezel angle, with approximately 12 cm each, treated with the fungicide Benlate and later with IBA. The assessments were made 30 days after planting, evaluating the appearance or absence of calluses, roots and shoots. Among the stakes, the woody ones showed the best regenerative capacity, reaching the maximum corpus callosum, rooting and shooting, regardless of IBA concentration. In the treatment with 2000 ppm IBA concentration, herbaceous and woody stakes showed the best results for rooting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Arcângelo Loss, UFRRJ
Atua na área de Agronomia, com enfâse em gênese, morfologia e classificação dos solos. Em seu curriculo Lattes os termos mais freqüentes na contextualização da produção científica são: Matéria orgânica do solo (MOS), fracionamento quimico e granulométrico da MOS, manejo do solo, carbono orgânico, solos de Tabuleiro, agroecologia. Currículo Lattes
Published
2009-05-14
How to Cite
Loss, A., Teixeira, M. B., Santos, T. de J., Gomes, V. M., & Queiroz, L. H. (2009). <b>Induction of rooting in cuttings of <em>Malvaviscus arboreus</em> Cav. with different concentrations of Indolbutiric Acid (IBA)</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i2.799. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 31(2), 269-273. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v31i2.799
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus