<b>Feeding strategies for diet based on forage cactus on the performance and digestibility in cows in late lactation</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i2.1233
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of different feeding strategies in diets based on forage cactus on the performance of lactating dairy Holstein were used five cows in 230 days in milk and 489 kg of live weight were assigned in a 5 x 5 latin square. The treatments were: total ration; separated ingredients; sorghum silage plus concentrate and separate forage cactus; forage cactus plus concentrate and separate silage; silage plus forage cactus and separate concentrate. The averages of intake and dry matter digestibility were 13.18 kg/day e 65.0%, respectively. The averages of daily milk production, fat corrected milk (4%) daily production and fat theor were, 13.35 kg; 12.74 kg e 3.73%. The feeding strategies didn't differ significantly to each other for any evaluated variableDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-03-20
How to Cite
Silva, A. E. V. N., Guim, A., Ferreira, M. de A., Lima, L. E. de, Pessoa, R. A. S., & Sosa, M. Y. (2008). <b>Feeding strategies for diet based on forage cactus on the performance and digestibility in cows in late lactation</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i2.1233. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 27(2), 269-276. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i2.1233
Issue
Section
Ruminant Nutrition
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
- I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.
0.9
2019CiteScore
29th percentile
Powered by 