Vinasse in the diet of lactating sows and its effect on litter

  • Dandara Silva Barros Instituto Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Jean kaique Valentim Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados
  • Silvana Lúcia dos Santos Medeiros Instituto Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Sandra Regina Faria Instituto Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Isabelli Dias Brito Pereira Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
  • Rita Therezinha Rolim Pietramale Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados
  • Heder José D'Àvilla Lima Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
  • Rodrigo Garófallo Garcia Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados
Keywords: cidifiers; sows; progeny; sugarcane stillage.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify the impact of adding vinasse as an acidifier in sows diet during the lactating period and its effect on litter. A total of 14 agroceres females were used from the first day of lactation until weaning. The vinasse was obtained in a mill near the experimental facility and was stored in sterilized barrels. Animals were distributed in a completely randomized experimental design into two treatments: control liquid diet and liquid diet with the inclusion of vinasse in each feed supply of the day. The diets were supplied four times a day, containing a mixture of ½ L of vinasse and ½ L of water. Feed leftovers were weighted daily. Feed intake was used to evaluate sows’ performance. The piglets were weighted every week after birth until weaning in order to obtain weight gain. Vinasse inclusion showed an increase (p < 0.05) in feed intake of lactating sows, improving diet palatability. Inclusion of acidifier in the diet did not show (p > 0.05) difference in weight gain of piglets. Vinasse consumption by sows did not influence litter performance. The inclusion of vinasse in the diet of lactating sows is beneficial because increases feed consumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alves, A. B., Fernandes, M. S., Guidastre, F. C., Costa, G. H. G., & Ferreira, O. E. (2019). Caracterização nutricional da vinhaça obtida de variedade cultivar média de cana-de-açúcar. Ciência & Tecnologia Fatec-JB, 11, 191-195.

Auldist, D. E., Morrish, L., Eason, P., & King, R. H. (1998). The influence of litter size on milk production of sows. Animal Science, 67(2), 333-337. doi: 10.1017/S1357729800010109

Boyd, D. R., Kensinger, R. S., Harrell, R. J., & Bauman, D. E. (1995). Nutrient uptake and endocrine regulation of milk synthesis by mammary tissue of lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science, 73, 36-56. doi: 10.2527/1995.73suppl_236x

Denck, F. M., Hilgemberg, J. O., & Lehnen, C. R. (2017). Uso de acidificantes em dietas para leitões em desmame e creche. Archivos de Zootecnia, 66(256), 629-638. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/495/49553571021.pdf

Dowarah, R., Verma, A. K., & Agarwal, N. (2017). The use of Lactobacillus as an alternative of antibiotic growth promoters in pigs: a review. Animal Nutrition, 3(1), 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2016.11.002

Fix, J. S., Cassady, J. P., Herring, W. O., Holl, J. W., Culbertson, M. S., & See, M. T. (2010). Effect of piglet birth weight on body weight, growth, backfat, and longissimus muscle area of commercial market swine. Livestock Science, 127(1), 51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.08.007

Gong, J., Yin, F., Hou, Y., & Yin, Y. (2014). Chinese herbs as alternatives to antibiotics in feed for swine and poultry production: Potential and challenges in application. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 94(2), 223-241. doi: 10.4141/cjas2013-144

Hidalgo, K., Rodríguez, B., Valdivié, M., & Febles, M. (2009). Utilización de la vinaza de destilería como aditivo para pollos en ceba. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 43(3). Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1930/193015481011.pdf

Kluge, H., Broz, J., & Eder, K. (2006). Effect of benzoic acid on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen balance, gastrointestinal microflora and parameters of microbial metabolism in piglets. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 90(8), 316-324. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00604.x

Li, J. (2017). Current status and prospects for in-feed antibiotics in the different stages of pork production—A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(12), 1667. doi: 105713/ajas.17.0418

Verussa, G. H., Corassa, A., dos Santos Pina, D., Ton, A. P. S., Komiyama, C. M., & Leite, R. G. (2017). Caracterização, uso e limitações da glicerina na alimentação de suínos: revisão. Arquivos de Ciências Veterinárias e Zoologia da UNIPAR, 19(3). doi: 10.25110/arqvet.v19i3.2016.6093

Mair, C., Plitzner, C., Domig, K. J., Schedle, K., & Windisch, W. (2010). Impact of inulin and a multispecies probiotic formulation on performance, microbial ecology and concomitant fermentation patterns in newly weaned piglets. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 94(5), 164-177. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01000.x

Miguel, W. C., Trindade Neto, M. A., Berto, D. A., Kobashigawa, E., & de Sena Gandra, E. R. (2011). Suplementação de acidificantes em rações de leitões desmamados: desempenho e digestibilidade. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, 48(2), 141-146. doi: 10.11606/S1413-95962011000200006

Namkung, H., Gong, M. L. J., Yu, H., Cottrill, M., & De Lange, C. F. M. (2004). Impact of feeding blends of organic acids and herbal extracts on growth performance, gut microbiota and digestive function in newly weaned pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 84(4), 697-704. doi: 10.4141/A04-005

Neves, M. F., & Conejero, M. A. (2007). Sistema agroindustrial da cana: cenários e agenda estratégica. Economia aplicada, 11(4), 587-604. doi: 10.1590/S1413-80502007000400007

Padilha, J. B., Groff, P. M., Turmina, R., & Teixeira, P. P. M. (2017). Mortalidade embrionária e fetal em suínos: uma revisão. Nucleus Animalium, 9(1), 7-16. doi: 10.3738/21751463.1649

Patiño, H., Patiño, B. O., Gil, J. L., & Castillo, S. G. (2012). Sustainable and competitive use as livestock feed of some co-products, by-products and effluents generated in the bio-ethanol industry. In H. P. S. Makkar (Ed.), Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges. Rome, IT: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

Park, K. J., & António, G. C. (2006). Análises de materiais biológicos. Campinas, SP: Unicamp.

Pissinin, D. (2016). Ferro para leitões: revisão de literatura. Nutritime Revista Eletrônica, 13(6).

Rostagno, H. S., Albino, L. F. T., Hannas, M. I., Donzele, J. L., Sakomura, N. K., Perazzo, F. G., ... & Barreto, S. L. T. (2017). Brazilian tables for Poultry and swine: Composition of foods and nutritional requirements. Viçosa, MG: Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, AU: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Rego, J. C. C., Ferreira, R. A. S., Brito, C. F., Moressi, G. B., Scandolera, A. J., & Warpechowski, M. B. (2012). Effect of the dietary acidification on the digestibility of nutrients in piglets. Revista Acadêmica: Ciência Animal, 10(1), 105-111. Retrieved from https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/cienciaanimal/article/view/12134

Sarmento, P., Garcia, R., Pires, A. J. V., & Nascimento, A. S. (1999). Tratamento do bagaço de cana-de-açúcar com uréia. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 28(6), 1203-1208. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35981999000600005

Verdon, M., Morrison, R. S., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2016). Rearing piglets in multi-litter group lactation systems: effects on piglet aggression and injuries post-weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 183, 35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.05.008

Viola, E. S., & Vieira, S. L. (2007). Suplementação de acidificantes orgânicos e inorgânicos em dietas para frangos de corte: desempenho zootécnico e morfologia intestinal. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 36(4), 1097-1104. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982007000500016

Published
2020-04-01
How to Cite
Barros, D. S., Valentim, J. kaique, Medeiros, S. L. dos S., Faria, S. R., Pereira, I. D. B., Pietramale, R. T. R., Lima, H. J. D., & Garcia, R. G. (2020). Vinasse in the diet of lactating sows and its effect on litter. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 42(1), e48152. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v42i1.48152
Section
Nonruminant Nutrition

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus