<b>The influence of two diets on the quality of water in nursery tanks used in marine shrimp (<em>Litopenaeus vannamei</em>, Boone, 1931)</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.670

  • Adriano Prysthon da Silva UFRPE
  • Paulo de Paula Mendes UFRPE

Abstract

Experiments were carried out in a commercial marine shrimp farm in order to evaluate the use of two diets in Litopenaeus vannamei post-larvae, during nursery phase, on physiochemical wastewater quality. Two feeding methods were adopted: Commercial Feeding Method (MAC) and Artemia Feeding Method (MAA).0 The nursery tanks (60 m3) were provided with 19 days post-larvae (PL19) with a stocking density of 16PL/liter. After 10 days of culture, the concentrations of nitrogen (ammonia, nitrite and nitrate) and phosphorus compounds (total phosphorus and orthophosphate) in the nursery tank were smaller for MAC, rather than MAA treatment (p < 0.05). Consequently, MAA treatment induced low levels of daily compounds increment, thus contributing to a significant reduction of the nutrients that caused water eutrophication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Paulo de Paula Mendes, UFRPE
Possui graduação em Engenharia de Pesca, mestrado em Agronomia (Ciências do Solo) e doutorado em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais. É professor, desde 1980, no Depto de Pesca e Aqüicultura da Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco. Ensina na graduação e pós-graduação as disciplinas: carcinicultura e Estatística experimental. Possui vários trabalhos, mais sua principal publicação foi o livro intitulado: Estatística Aplicada a Aqüicultura (edição esgotada). Suas linhas de pesquisa é com o camarão Litopenaeus vannamei
Published
2008-02-15
How to Cite
Silva, A. P. da, & Mendes, P. de P. (2008). <b>The influence of two diets on the quality of water in nursery tanks used in marine shrimp (<em>Litopenaeus vannamei</em>, Boone, 1931)</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.670. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 28(1), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.670
Section
Animal Production

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus