<b>Structure and floristic composition of three secondary forest patches in the city of Rio de Janeiro</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v26i4.1525

  • Claudio Alexandre de Aquino Santana UFRRJ
  • Cátia Cilene Doneles de Lima UFRRJ
  • Luís Mauro Sampaio Magalhães UFRRJ

Abstract

Urban forests offer important environmental services for surrounding and respective population. This paper aims at characterizing three forest patches in the city of Rio de Janeiro. To accomplish the task, a phytosociologic survey was carried out using sampling method and units of 10 x 10 meters, where all the individuals with CBH (circumference breast height) equal or larger than 15 centimeters and the same or superior to three meters high were identified and measured. Results have shown significant differences in floristic composition and structure where the families Leguminosae and Moraceae were predominant in the two fragments of larger diversity and Compositae at the one with smaller diversity. Most of the species belong to pioneer succeeding groups, and zoocory was the most important seed-dispersal strategy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Claudio Alexandre de Aquino Santana, UFRRJ
Possui graduação em Engenharia Florestal pela Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (1996) e mestrado em Ciências Ambientais e Florestais pela Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (2001). Atualmente é engenheiro florestal da Prefeitura da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Tem experiência na área de Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal, com ênfase em Fitossociologia e Recuperação de Areas Degradadas Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-03-31
How to Cite
Santana, C. A. de A., Lima, C. C. D. de, & Magalhães, L. M. S. (2008). <b>Structure and floristic composition of three secondary forest patches in the city of Rio de Janeiro</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v26i4.1525. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, 26(4), 443-451. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v26i4.1525
Section
Biology Sciences

 

0.6
2019CiteScore
 
 
31st percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.6
2019CiteScore
 
 
31st percentile
Powered by  Scopus