Inguinal herniorrhaphy: local or regional anesthesia?

  • Martin Zavadinack Netto UEM
  • Orlando Ribeiro Prado Filho UEM
  • César Orlando Peralta Bandeira UEM
  • Kelston Paulo Felice de Sales UEM
  • Tatiana Akemi Camilote UEM

Abstract

Inguinal herniorrhaphy is one of the most frequent surgical procedures around the world. Therefore its optimization has been tried to reduce expenses, hospitalization time and complications resulting from surgical and anesthetic procedures. This experiment compared regional and local anesthesia in herniorrhaphy of 32 patients divided into two groups. Regional anesthesia was applied to group one patients and local anesthesia was applied to group two patients. Regional anesthesia showed to be more effective in terms of trans-surgical discomfort while local anesthesia showed to be more efficient in reducing post-surgical complications and hospitalization time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Martin Zavadinack Netto, UEM
Graduado em Medicina pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (1984), mestrado em Gastroenterologia Cirúrgica pelo Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo (1995) e doutorado em Medicina pela Universidade Federal de São Paulo (2003). Atualmente é professor adjunto da Universidade Estadual de Maringá Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-05-09
How to Cite
Zavadinack Netto, M., Prado Filho, O. R., Bandeira, C. O. P., Sales, K. P. F. de, & Camilote, T. A. (2008). Inguinal herniorrhaphy: local or regional anesthesia?. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, 22, 621-623. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v22i0.2996
Section
Biology Sciences

 

0.6
2019CiteScore
 
 
31st percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.6
2019CiteScore
 
 
31st percentile
Powered by  Scopus