Bacteriological analysis of water in dental units

  • Hiran Vinicius Matelli Xavier UEM
  • Joice Renata Bulla UEM
  • Luciana Melo Luize UEM
  • Tatiana Moreno UEM
  • Maria Cristina Bronharo Tognim UEM
  • Lourdes Botelho Garcia UEM

Abstract

Although, in recent years, great efforts have been made to inform and make health professionals aware of the importance of sterilization, disinfection and antisepsis, little considerations have been shown in relation to the quality of the water of dental unit systems. In the present work 72 samples of water from 68 dental equipments and 4 faucets were submitted to bacteriological analysis, with the objective of detecting heterothrophic bacteria and coliform group. The samples collected from the faucets were compatible with the water potability patterns. In contrast, 63 (92.7%) of the 68 samples obtained from the dental unit water systems were considered contaminated and only 5 (7.3%) were in agreement with the potability patterns. It was observed that 42 water samples (61.8%) were heavily contaminated, 14 (20.6%) presented moderate index of contamination and 7 (10.3%) were slightly contaminated. The results suggest the need of decontamination of water reservoirs and hoses of these equipments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lourdes Botelho Garcia, UEM
Atualmente é professor associado-nivel A da Universidade Estadual de Maringá. Tem experiência na área de Microbiologia, com ênfase em Bacteriologia Médica, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: estreptococos, bacilos Gram-negativos não fermentadores (Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), atividade antimicrobiana de antibióticos e desinfetantes. Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-05-09
How to Cite
Xavier, H. V. M., Bulla, J. R., Luize, L. M., Moreno, T., Tognim, M. C. B., & Garcia, L. B. (2008). Bacteriological analysis of water in dental units. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, 22, 631-636. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v22i0.2998
Section
Biology Sciences

 

0.6
2019CiteScore
 
 
31st percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.6
2019CiteScore
 
 
31st percentile
Powered by  Scopus