The application of the Marxist theory of state in the interpretation of the coup d’état of April <sup>1st</sup>, 1964

  • Nilson Nobuaki Yamauti UEM

Abstract

The report of the historical process that caused the deposition of president João Goulart is analyzed in this article. The concern in observing the chronology of the facts is the methodological approach that guides this report. In factual terms, the aim is to build an interpretation for the following questions: if the President had the control of the Army and the trade unions, why was he deposed without any reaction? Did the deposition of the President arise from his intention to develop structural reforms with the support of the working class? In theoretical terms, the aim is to verify whether it was the bourgeois characteristic of the State which made unfeasible a government supported by unions and a worker class party confined to illegality. Foregrounded by the Marxist theory of state, it is possible to conclude that Goulart was deposed for not considering the distinction between institutional and revolutionary politics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nilson Nobuaki Yamauti, UEM
Possui graduação em Filosofia pela Universidade de São Paulo (1988) , graduação em Sociologia pela Universidade de São Paulo (1983) , graduação em Jornalismo pela Universidade de São Paulo (1978) , mestrado em Ciência Política pela Universidade de São Paulo (1994) e doutorado em Ciência Política pela Universidade de São Paulo (1998) . Atualmente é Professor Adjunto da Universidade Estadual de Maringá. Tem experiência na área de Ciência Política. Atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: Governo, Estado, Governo Collor, Política, Governabilidade e Instituições Políticas Currículo Lattes
Published
2007-09-28
How to Cite
Yamauti, N. N. (2007). The application of the Marxist theory of state in the interpretation of the coup d’état of April <sup>1st</sup&gt;, 1964. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, 28(2), 219-239. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihumansoc.v28i2.154
Section
Social Sciences