Problematizing Speech in J.M. Coetzee’s <em>Foe</em> (1986)
Abstract
Whereas speech has always been considered in Western thought to be superior to writing since the former is nearer to originating thought, writing has been thought to be a contaminated form of speech because of its mediating and impure factors. However, the presence and originality of speech are subverted by interpretation, especially when it is put to writing. The speech-writing dichotomy applied to J.M. Coetzee’s Foe (1986) reveals the ambiguous relationship between the female narrator’s speech and the male writer’s attempt to interpret her story artistically.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-07-02
How to Cite
Bonnici, T. (2008). Problematizing Speech in J.M. Coetzee’s <em>Foe</em> (1986). Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, 21, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihumansoc.v21i0.4181
Issue
Section
Literature and Linguistics
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.












