Flexibility, job insecurity and health bureaucracy: three determinants of medical deprofessionalization
Abstract
In the conformation of the industrial society, the professions emerged as a fundamental movement of the division of labor, of occupational and class stratification. Its maintenance and importance over time has been sustained through professionalization processes for the production of specialized knowledge that distinguishes it from other occupations and at the same time gives it autonomy and social recognition to give legitimacy and permanence in function of society. The medical profession has served as an ideological apparatus on the part of the State to control and dominate society based on health needs through professionals who exercise reduced power relations to secondary agents, perpetuating class differences. The professions in general have suffered the ravages of neoliberal policies and the medical profession is no exception. The reality of health services circulates among neglected hospitals, lack of budget, poor care, lack of material, human resources and medicines, bureaucratic procedures, and other structural shortcomings that subsume the indicators and administrative procedures to the professional's practice.
Downloads
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.