House call assessment in early childhood programs: contributions to the brazilian reality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v20i0.55613Keywords:
House Calls, Models Theoretical, Child Development, Child HealthAbstract
Introduction: This study consists of a reflection on house call assessment in early childhood programs, which aimed to discuss the dimensions involved in an assessment model for the Brazilian reality, in addition to the authors’ perception of the topic. Method: This reflection was structured around the following topics: dimensions involved in house call assessment and the assessment process in Brazilian programs. Considering the centrality and relevance of house calls in Brazilian programs focused on early childhood and the tendency to consolidate this technology as an intervention strategy suitable for programs of this nature, it is proposed to organize four dimensions for house call assessment: dosage, content, relationship, and participant responsiveness. Results: Assessing the intervention technology of programs aimed at early childhood, in this case house calls, allows us to inquire into the processes that occur during house calls and to open the ‘black box’ of intervention, making it possible to clarify operational issues and propose recommendations to fix them. Conclusion: The model proposed allows supervisors and decision makers to systematically monitor and adjust the dimensions that impact the results of house call programs aimed at early childhood.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Fundação Maria Cecília Souto Vidigal. Agenda Regional para eldesarollo integral de laprimera infância. Brasil: informe de progreso de políticas de primerainfancia. São Paulo, SP. 2020. 20 p. Disponível em: https://www.fmcsv.org.br/pt-BR/biblioteca/brasil-relatorio-progresso-politicas-primeira-infancia/
2. Yousafzai AK, Aboud FE, Nores M, Kaur R. Reporting guidelines for implementation research on nurturing care interventions designed to promote early childhood development. Ann N Y AcadSci. 2018;1419(1):26-37. DOI:10.1111/nyas.13648
3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Guia para orientar ações intersetoriais na primeira infância. Brasília, 2018. Disponível em: https://undime.org.br/uploads/documentos/phprjdlba_5e3064022386d.pdf
4. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Parenting Matters: Supporting Parents of Children Ages 0-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2016.
5. Leer J, Boo F, Expósito A, Powell C. A Snapshot on the Quality of Seven Home Visit Parenting Programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2015. (IDB Technical Note, 1083). Available from: https://publications.iadb.org/en/snapshot-quality-seven-home-visit-parenting-programs-latin-america-and-caribbean-0
6. Lombardi J. What policymakers need from implementation evaluations of early childhood development programs. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1419(1):17-19. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13661
7. Paulsell D, Boller K, Hallgren K, Esposito A. Assessing home visit quality. Zero to Three. 2010;30(6):16-21. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ926587
8. Manz PH, Power TJ, Roggman LA, Eisenberg RA, Gernhart A, Faison J, et al. Integrating the little talks intervention into Early Head Start: An experimental examination of implementation supports involving fidelity monitoring and performance feedback. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;79:87-96. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.034
9. Schodt S, Parr J, Araujo MC, Rubio-Codina M. Measuring the quality of home-visiting services: a review of the literature. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2015. (IDB Technical Note, 881). Available from: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Measuring-the-Quality-of-Home-Visiting-Services-A-Review-of-the-Literature.pdf
10. Hartz ZMA, Vieira-da-Silva LM (org). Avaliação em saúde: dos modelos teóricos à prática na avaliação de programas e sistemas de saúde. Salvador: EDUFBA; Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2005. 275 p.
11. Berkel C, Mauricio AM, Sandler IN, Wolchik SA, Gallo CG, Brown CH. The Cascading Effects of Multiple Dimensions of Implementation on Program Outcomes: a Test of a Theoretical Model. Prev Sci. 2018;19(6):782-794. DOI:10.1007/s11121-017-0855-4
12. Roggman LA, Cook GA, Innocenti MS, Norman VJ, Boyce LK, Peterson CA. Home visit quality variations in two early head start programs in relation to parenting and child vocabulary outcomes. Infant Ment. Health J.2016;37(3):193-207. DOI:10.1002/imhj.21565
13 .Boller K, Daro D, Strong D, Zaveri H, Paulsell D, Hargreaves M, et al. Data Collection Instruments for the Evidence-Based Home Visiting to Prevent Child Maltreatment Cross-Site Evaluation. Washington, DC: Children’s Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, October 2014. Available from: https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/data-collection-instruments-for-the-evidencebased-home-visiting-to-prevent-child-maltreatment-crosssite-evaluation
14. Wasik BA, Mattera SK, Lloyd CM, Boller K. Intervention dosage in early childhood care and education: It’s complicated. OPRE Res Br OPRE 2013-15.2013.Available from:https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/65bc22bb6a384f7c9b93a82079416a66.html
15. Nygren P, Green B, Winters K, Rockhill A. What’s Happening During Home Visits? Exploring the Relationship of Home Visiting Content and Dosage to Parenting Outcomes. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22(Suppl 1):52-61. DOI:10.1007/s10995-018-2547-5
16 . Aboud FE, Prado EL. Measuring the implementation of early childhood development programs. Ann N Y AcadSci. 2018;1419(1):249-263. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13642
17. Siqueira LD, Oliveira Reticena K, Nascimento LH, Abreu FCP, Fracolli LA. Home visit assessment strategies: A scope review. Acta Paul.Enferm. 2019;32(5). DOI:10.1590/1982-0194201900081
18. Tomlin AM, Hines E, Sturm L. Reflection in home visiting: the what, why, and a beginning step toward how. Infant Ment Health J. 2016;37(6):617-627. DOI:10.1002/imhj.21610
19. Zarnowiecki D, Nguyen H, Catherine Hampton, Boffa J, Segal L. The Australian Nurse-Family Partnership Program for aboriginal mothers and babies: Describing client complexity and implications for program delivery. Midwifery. 2018;65:72-81. DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.019
20 .Bromer J, Korfmacher J. Providing High-Quality Support Services to Home-Based Child Care: A Conceptual Model and Literature Review. Early Educ Dev. 2017;28(6):745-772. DOI:10.1080/10409289.2016.1256720
21. Korfmacher J, Frese M, Gowani S. Examining program quality in early childhood home visiting: From infrastructure to relationships. Infant Ment Health J. 2019;40(3):380-394. DOI:10.1002/imhj.21773
22. Shenderovich Y, Eisner M, Cluver L, Doubt J, Berezin M, Majokweni S, et al. Delivering a Parenting Program in South Africa: The Impact of Implementation on Outcomes. J Child Fam Stud. 2019;28(4):1005-1017. DOI:10.1007/s10826-018-01319-y
23. Sama-Miller E, Akers L, Mraz-Esposito A. Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review: Executive Summary. 2017. Available from:https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource-library/search?sort=recent.
24. Kaiser DE, Freitas TCS. Programa primeira infância melhor: percepções do visitador. Ciência, Cuidado e Saúde. 2010;9(1):81-90. DOI: 10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v9i1.7195
25. Alves SS, Bezerra CC, Lima CRG. Supervisão da visita domiciliar para o desenvolvimento na primeira infância. Extensão em Ação. 2016;02(11):118-126. Disponível em: http://periodicos.ufc.br/extensaoemacao/article/view/11835
2. Yousafzai AK, Aboud FE, Nores M, Kaur R. Reporting guidelines for implementation research on nurturing care interventions designed to promote early childhood development. Ann N Y AcadSci. 2018;1419(1):26-37. DOI:10.1111/nyas.13648
3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Guia para orientar ações intersetoriais na primeira infância. Brasília, 2018. Disponível em: https://undime.org.br/uploads/documentos/phprjdlba_5e3064022386d.pdf
4. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Parenting Matters: Supporting Parents of Children Ages 0-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2016.
5. Leer J, Boo F, Expósito A, Powell C. A Snapshot on the Quality of Seven Home Visit Parenting Programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2015. (IDB Technical Note, 1083). Available from: https://publications.iadb.org/en/snapshot-quality-seven-home-visit-parenting-programs-latin-america-and-caribbean-0
6. Lombardi J. What policymakers need from implementation evaluations of early childhood development programs. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1419(1):17-19. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13661
7. Paulsell D, Boller K, Hallgren K, Esposito A. Assessing home visit quality. Zero to Three. 2010;30(6):16-21. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ926587
8. Manz PH, Power TJ, Roggman LA, Eisenberg RA, Gernhart A, Faison J, et al. Integrating the little talks intervention into Early Head Start: An experimental examination of implementation supports involving fidelity monitoring and performance feedback. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;79:87-96. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.034
9. Schodt S, Parr J, Araujo MC, Rubio-Codina M. Measuring the quality of home-visiting services: a review of the literature. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2015. (IDB Technical Note, 881). Available from: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Measuring-the-Quality-of-Home-Visiting-Services-A-Review-of-the-Literature.pdf
10. Hartz ZMA, Vieira-da-Silva LM (org). Avaliação em saúde: dos modelos teóricos à prática na avaliação de programas e sistemas de saúde. Salvador: EDUFBA; Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2005. 275 p.
11. Berkel C, Mauricio AM, Sandler IN, Wolchik SA, Gallo CG, Brown CH. The Cascading Effects of Multiple Dimensions of Implementation on Program Outcomes: a Test of a Theoretical Model. Prev Sci. 2018;19(6):782-794. DOI:10.1007/s11121-017-0855-4
12. Roggman LA, Cook GA, Innocenti MS, Norman VJ, Boyce LK, Peterson CA. Home visit quality variations in two early head start programs in relation to parenting and child vocabulary outcomes. Infant Ment. Health J.2016;37(3):193-207. DOI:10.1002/imhj.21565
13 .Boller K, Daro D, Strong D, Zaveri H, Paulsell D, Hargreaves M, et al. Data Collection Instruments for the Evidence-Based Home Visiting to Prevent Child Maltreatment Cross-Site Evaluation. Washington, DC: Children’s Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, October 2014. Available from: https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/data-collection-instruments-for-the-evidencebased-home-visiting-to-prevent-child-maltreatment-crosssite-evaluation
14. Wasik BA, Mattera SK, Lloyd CM, Boller K. Intervention dosage in early childhood care and education: It’s complicated. OPRE Res Br OPRE 2013-15.2013.Available from:https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/65bc22bb6a384f7c9b93a82079416a66.html
15. Nygren P, Green B, Winters K, Rockhill A. What’s Happening During Home Visits? Exploring the Relationship of Home Visiting Content and Dosage to Parenting Outcomes. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22(Suppl 1):52-61. DOI:10.1007/s10995-018-2547-5
16 . Aboud FE, Prado EL. Measuring the implementation of early childhood development programs. Ann N Y AcadSci. 2018;1419(1):249-263. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13642
17. Siqueira LD, Oliveira Reticena K, Nascimento LH, Abreu FCP, Fracolli LA. Home visit assessment strategies: A scope review. Acta Paul.Enferm. 2019;32(5). DOI:10.1590/1982-0194201900081
18. Tomlin AM, Hines E, Sturm L. Reflection in home visiting: the what, why, and a beginning step toward how. Infant Ment Health J. 2016;37(6):617-627. DOI:10.1002/imhj.21610
19. Zarnowiecki D, Nguyen H, Catherine Hampton, Boffa J, Segal L. The Australian Nurse-Family Partnership Program for aboriginal mothers and babies: Describing client complexity and implications for program delivery. Midwifery. 2018;65:72-81. DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.019
20 .Bromer J, Korfmacher J. Providing High-Quality Support Services to Home-Based Child Care: A Conceptual Model and Literature Review. Early Educ Dev. 2017;28(6):745-772. DOI:10.1080/10409289.2016.1256720
21. Korfmacher J, Frese M, Gowani S. Examining program quality in early childhood home visiting: From infrastructure to relationships. Infant Ment Health J. 2019;40(3):380-394. DOI:10.1002/imhj.21773
22. Shenderovich Y, Eisner M, Cluver L, Doubt J, Berezin M, Majokweni S, et al. Delivering a Parenting Program in South Africa: The Impact of Implementation on Outcomes. J Child Fam Stud. 2019;28(4):1005-1017. DOI:10.1007/s10826-018-01319-y
23. Sama-Miller E, Akers L, Mraz-Esposito A. Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review: Executive Summary. 2017. Available from:https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource-library/search?sort=recent.
24. Kaiser DE, Freitas TCS. Programa primeira infância melhor: percepções do visitador. Ciência, Cuidado e Saúde. 2010;9(1):81-90. DOI: 10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v9i1.7195
25. Alves SS, Bezerra CC, Lima CRG. Supervisão da visita domiciliar para o desenvolvimento na primeira infância. Extensão em Ação. 2016;02(11):118-126. Disponível em: http://periodicos.ufc.br/extensaoemacao/article/view/11835
Downloads
Published
2021-09-01
Issue
Section
Reflection articles
How to Cite
House call assessment in early childhood programs: contributions to the brazilian reality. (2021). Ciência, Cuidado E Saúde, 20. https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v20i0.55613
