International, transcontinental and intrarregional human mobilities: biopower, migrant strategies, and representations (19th to 21st centuries)

  • Lai Sai Acón Chan Universidad de Costa Rica
  • Ronald Soto-Quiros Université de Bordeaux/AMERIBER, Université Bordeaux Montaigne
Keywords: International human mobilities, transcontinental, intrarregional, biopower, migrant strategies, representations

Abstract

This dossier emerges as an initiative of its coordinators and editors –Lai Sai Acón Chan and Ronald Soto-Quirós– who are interested in international migrations and collaborate jointly on a project to recover the historical memory of Chinese migrations in Costa Rica (PREMEHCHI for its acronym in Spanish). This project is led by an international multidisciplinary team of researchers from the University of Costa Rica, the UNED (Costa Rica), the multidisciplinary team on Latin America and the Iberian Peninsula of the Université Bordeaux Montaigne (Bordeaux, France) and the University of Minnesota Morris. PREMEHCHI is based at the University of Costa Rica (San José, Costa Rica).

The dossier of this issue of Diálogos, a journal of the Department of History and the Graduate Program in History of the State University of Maringá (UEM) is a first effort to publish bilingual versions of the same article ​​(English and Spanish or Portuguese) in order to achieve greater internationalization and facilitate the dissemination of knowledge. In this particular case, the dossier focuses on the phenomenon of international migration –or international human mobility – addressed from the perspective of scholars specializing in a wide array of disciplines (history, sociology, political science, cultural studies, cinema, and others), from different geographical locations (Costa Rica, Honduras, United States, France and Spain) and in a wide chronological span (XIX-XXI centuries).

In the dossier title the use of the concept of human mobility has been privileged over the term migration. The use of this term is becoming increasingly frequent nowadays. The notion of human mobility has already begun to be used in different disciplines since the 1960s[3]. According to the International Organization for Migration (IOM), human mobility is a generic term that covers all the different forms of movement of people and implies a wider range of these movements than the term migration (IOM, 2019, p. 91-92).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Lai Sai Acón Chan, Universidad de Costa Rica

Ph.D. in English Literature from Washington State University and Full Professor at the School of Modern Languages of the University of Costa Rica (UCR). She currently serves as Director of the Confucius Institute of the UCR. Her areas of expertise are cultural studies, post-colonialism, film studies and Chinese American literature. She has conducted studies about nation formation and identity in Hong Kong and about the Chinese diasporas in the United States and Costa Rica. Researcher of the PREMEHCHI interdisciplinary team (Project of recovery of the historical memory of Chinese migrations to Costa Rica).

Ronald Soto-Quiros, Université de Bordeaux/AMERIBER, Université Bordeaux Montaigne

Doctor en Estudios Ibéricos e Iberoamericanos (historia) de la Université Michel de Montaigne-Bordeaux 3. Máster en Historia y Civilizaciones de la Université Toulouse II-Le Mirail. Bachiller y licenciado en Historia de la Universidad de Costa Rica. Es docente investigador en estudios ibéricos e iberoamericanos del Instituto Universitario de Tecnología de Bordeaux de la Université de Bordeaux donde imparte cursos sobre España e Hispanoamérica. Encargado de relaciones internacionales con países hispánicos. Investigador del grupo “Recherches Américanistes” del laboratorio AMERIBER de la Université Bordeaux Montaigne. Trabaja sobre la historia de América Central (siglos XIX-XX).

References

ALAVEZ RUIZ, Aleida. Interculturalidad: concepto, alcances y derecho. México: Cámara de Diputados, Mesa Directiva, 2014. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/1680301bc3. Accessed on: Oct. 20, 2019.

BOTTICELLI, Sebastián. La gubernamentalidad del Estado en Foucault: un problema moderno. Praxis Filosófica, Nueva Serie, n. 42, p. 83-106, enero-junio 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/pafi/n42/n42a04.pdf. Accessed on: Oct. 25, 2019.

CEAR. Movilidad humana. Migraciones. Diccionario de Asilo. CEAR. Comisión de Ayuda al Refugio en Euskadi. S.f. Retrieved from: http://diccionario.cear-euskadi.org/movilidad-humana/. Accessed on: Jan. 10, 2020.

CHAVEL, Solange. El biopoder en acción: el concepto de migración. In: BOLAÑOS GUERRA, Bernardo (coord.). Biopolítica y migración. El eslabón perdido de la globalización. México: UAM, Unidad Cuajimalpa, 2015, p. 29-50.

CHAVEL, Solange. De la migration à la mobilité: comment aller au-delà du nationalisme méthodologique? Raisons politiques, n. 54, 2, p. 53-66, 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.cairn.info/revue-raisons-politiques-2014-2-page-53.htm. Accessed on: Nov. 15, 2019.

IOM UN Migration. International Migration Law. Glossary on Migration. Geneva (Switzerland): IOM, 2019. Retrieved from: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/iml_34_glossary.pdf. Accessed on: Dec. 12, 2019.

KECK, Frédérick. Les usages du biopolitique. L’Homme, n. 187-188, p. 295-314, 2008. Retrieved from: https://journals.openedition.org/lhomme/29305. Accessed on: Oct. 8, 2019.

LASCOUMES, Pierre. La Gouvernementalité: de la critique de l’État aux technologies du pouvoir. Le portiQue. Revue de philosophie et de sciences humaines, n. 13-14, p. 1-15, 2004. Retrieved from: https://journals.openedition.org/leportique/625. Accessed on: Sept. 8, 2019.

MONTANARI, Armando; STANISCIA, Barbara. Human Mobility: An Issue of Multidisciplinary Research. In: DOMÍNGUEZ-MUJICA, Josefina (ed.) Global Change and Human Mobility. New York, Singapore, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London: Springer, 2016 (Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences), p. 1-24.

PARRINI, Rodrigo. Biopolíticas del abandono: migración y dispositivos médicos en la frontera sur de México. Nómadas, Universidad Central, Colombia, n. 42, p. 111-127, abr. 2015. Retrieved from: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/noma/n42/n42a07.pdf. Accessed on: Oct. 5, 2019.

PELLERIN, Hélène. De la migration à la mobilité: changement de paradigme dans le gestion migratoire. Le cas du Canada. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales, v. 27, n. 1, p. 57-75, 2011. Retrieved from: https://journals.openedition.org/remi/5435. Accessed on: Oct. 20, 2019.

PEÑA, Lorenzo; AUSÍN, Txtexu. Pasando fronteras: El valor de la movilidad humana. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés Editores/Dilemata, 2015.

RABINOW, Paul; ROSE, Nikolas. Thoughts on the concept of biopower Today. (2003). Retrieved from: http://www.urbanlab.org/articles/Rabinow%20and%20Rose-BiopowerToday03.pdf. Accessed on: Nov. 10, 2019.

SOUZA LIMA FARIA, Peter de. La biopolitique de l’immigration dans le contexte européen contemporain. Eikasia. Revista de Filosofia, n. 77, p. 295-306, oct. 2017. Retrieved from: http://revistadefilosofia.com/77-13.pdf. Accessed on: Oct. 15, 2019.

VARELA BARRIOS, Edgar. Biopoder, biopolítica y gubernamentalidad: referentes de interpretación y crítica del poder managerial. Organizações e Sustenatbilidade, Londrina,v. 2, n. 2, p. 3-37, jul./dez. 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/ros/article/view/20825/16277. Accessed on: Oct. 10, 2019.
Published
2020-02-25
How to Cite
Lai Sai Acón Chan, & Soto-Quiros, R. (2020). International, transcontinental and intrarregional human mobilities: biopower, migrant strategies, and representations (19th to 21st centuries). Dialogos, 24(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4025/dialogos.v24i1.52456