A CONSTRUÇÃO DE UM METAPARADIGMA PARA A CIÊNCIA ECONÔMICA
uma proposta de framework pluralista
Resumen
A partir da ocorrência dos apelos por uma Economia pluralista há mais de quatro décadas e das dificuldades encontradas para sua concretização, dadas às ambiguidades sobre o que exatamente se entende por esse conceito, esse artigo busca, através de um framework demonstrar como um metaparadigma pluralista pode solucionar essa incipiência. Os caminhos para a sua concepção passam pela análise das dimensões paradigmáticas das escolas de pensamento neoclássica, pós-keynesiana e evolucionista. Com base nessa perspectiva se pretende justificar um procedimento descritivo para o termo paradigma, além de elaborar um cabedal do potencial de pensamento pluralista para a pesquisa científica. Em suma, a abordagem através de um metaparadigma pluralista demonstra que é possível substituir as idiossincrasias específicas de um paradigma à la Kuhn por princípios pluralistas.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
BERGER, Peter; LUCKMANN, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday, 1966.
BIGO, Vinca; NEGRU, Ioana. “From Fragmentation to Ontologically Reflexive Pluralism”. Journal of Philosophical Economics, v. 1, n. 2, p. 127-150, 2008.
COLANDER, David, HOLT, Richard P.; ROSSER, J. Barkley. “The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics”. Review of Political Economy, v. 16, n. 4, p. 485-499, 2004.
COLANDER, David, HOLT, Richard P.; ROSSER, J. Barkley. “How to Win Friends and (Possibly) Influence Mainstream Economists”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 32 (3), p. 397-408, 2010.
DAVIS, J. “Samuels on Methodological Pluralism in Economics”. Department of Economic, Working Paper 2012-01, Marquette University, Milwaukee, 2012.
DE LANGHE, Robert. “How Monist Is Heterodoxy?” Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 34, n. 4, p. 793-805, 2010.
DEQUECH, David. “Neoclassical, Mainstream, Orthodox, and Heterodox Economics”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 30, n. 2, p. 279-302, 2007-2008.
DOBUSCH, Leonhard; KAPELLER, Jakob. “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science? New Answers to Veblen’s Old Question”. Journal of Economic Issues, 43, 4, p. 867-898, 2009.
DOBUSCH, Leonhard; KAPELLER, Jakob. “Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics”. Journal of Economic Issues, 46, 4, p. 1035-1057, 2012.
DOW, Sheila C. “Structured Pluralism”. Journal of Economic Methodology, v. 11, 3, p. 275-290, 2004.
DOW, Sheila C. “Axioms and Babylonian Thought: A Reply”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27, 3, p. 385-391, 2005.
DOW, Sheila C. “Plurality in Orthodox and Heterodox Economics”. Journal of Philosophical Economics, 1, 2, p. 73-96, 2008a.
DOW, Sheila C. “A Future for Schools of Thought and Pluralism in Heterodox Economics”. In J.T. Harvey and R.F. Garnett, Jr. (eds.) Future Directions for Heterodox Economics, p. 9-26. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008b.
FLECK, Ludwik. The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [1935] 1979.
FULLBROOK, Edward. The crisis in economics - the post-autistic economics movement: the first 600 days. London; New York: Routledge, 2003.
GARNETT, Robert. “Paradigms and Pluralism in Heterodox Economics”. Review of Political Economy, 18, 4, p. 521-546, 2006.
GARNETT, Robert; OLSEN, Erik K.; STARR, Martha. Economic Pluralism. London: Routledge, 2010.
GIERE, Ronald N. Science without Laws. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999.
HODGSON, Geoffrey; MÄKI, Uskali; MCCLOSKEY, Donald. “A Plea for a Rigorous and Pluralistic Economics”. American Economic Review, v. 82, n. 2, p. xxv, 1992.
HOLCOMBE, Randall G. “Pluralism versus Heterodoxy in Economics and the Social Sciences”. The Journal of Philosophical Economics, v. 1 (2), p. 51-72, 2008.
HOPKINS, Barbara. “The Institutional Barriers to Heterodox Pluralism”. Review of Radical Political Economics, v. 42, 3, p. 338-343, 2010.
KIM, H. S. “An integrative framework for conceptualizing clients: A proposal for a nursing perspective in the new century”. Nursing Science Quarterly, v. 13, n. 1, p. 37-40, 2000.
KING, John E. “Post-Keynesians and Others”. Review of Political Economy, v. 24 (2), p. 305-319, 2012.
KLAES, M. “Evolutionary Economics: In Defence Of ‘Vagueness’”. Journal of Economic Methodology, v. 11, n. 3, p. 359-376, 2004.
KUHN, Thomas S. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 8ª ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, [1962] 2003.
LARUE, Louis. “A defense of reasonable pluralism in economics”. Journal of Economic Methodology, v. 1, p. 1-15, 2022.
LAVOIE, Marc. “Do Heterodox Theories Have Anything in Common? A Post-Keynesian Point of View”. European Journal of Economics: Intervention, v. 3, 1, p. 87-112, 2006.
LAWSON, Tony. “The Nature of Heterodox Economics”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 30, n. 4, p. 483-505, 2006.
LEE, Frederic S. “Pluralism in Heterodox Economics”. In: Economic Pluralism, (eds) Robert Garnett; Erik K. Olsen; Martha Starr, p. 19-35. London: Routledge, 2010.
MÄKI, U. “The one world and the many theories”. In: Salanti e Scrapanti (Org.) Pluralism in Economics: new prespectives in history and methodology. Cheltenham: EAEPE & Edward Elgar, p.37-47, 1997.
MARQUÉS, Gustavo; WEISMAN, Diego. “Not anything goes: a case for a restricted pluralism”. The Journal of Philosophical Economics, v. 2 (1), p. 115-136, 2008.
MELEIS, Afaf Ibrahim. Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.
MORGAN, Mary; RUTHERFORD, Malcolm. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Annual Supplement to Volume 30. History of Political Economy. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.
NELSON, Julie A. “Confronting the Science/Value Split: notes on Feminist Economics, Institutionalism, Pragmatism and Process Thought”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 27 (1), p. 49-64, 2003.
POPPER, K. R. “The Myth of the Framework”: In Defence of Science and Rationality. Routledge: London, 1994.
POPPER, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, [1935] 2002.
SAMUELS, Warren J. “Methodological Pluralism”. In Handbook of Economic Methodology, (eds.) John B. Davis; D. Wade Hands; Uskali Mäki, p. 300-303. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar, 1998.
SAMUELS, Warren J. “Institutional Economics after One Century”. Journal of Economic Issues, v. 34 (2), p. 305-315, 2000.
SENT, Esther-Mirjam. “Pleas for Pluralism”. In Real World Economics: a Post-Autistic Economics Reader, edited by Edward Fullbrook, p. 177-184. London, 2006.
STERMAN, John D.; WITTENBERG, Jason. “Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolution”. Organization Science, v. 10, 3, p. 322-341, 1999.
VAN BOUWEL, Jeroen. “Towards a Framework for Pluralism in Economics”. Post Autistic Economics Review, n. 31, 2005.
WALLER, William T. “Is Convergence among Heterodox Schools Possible, Meaningful, or Desirable?” In Economic Pluralism, Robert Garnett, Erik K. Olsen and Martha Starr (eds.), p. 48-60. London: Routledge, 2010.
BIGO, Vinca; NEGRU, Ioana. “From Fragmentation to Ontologically Reflexive Pluralism”. Journal of Philosophical Economics, v. 1, n. 2, p. 127-150, 2008.
COLANDER, David, HOLT, Richard P.; ROSSER, J. Barkley. “The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics”. Review of Political Economy, v. 16, n. 4, p. 485-499, 2004.
COLANDER, David, HOLT, Richard P.; ROSSER, J. Barkley. “How to Win Friends and (Possibly) Influence Mainstream Economists”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 32 (3), p. 397-408, 2010.
DAVIS, J. “Samuels on Methodological Pluralism in Economics”. Department of Economic, Working Paper 2012-01, Marquette University, Milwaukee, 2012.
DE LANGHE, Robert. “How Monist Is Heterodoxy?” Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 34, n. 4, p. 793-805, 2010.
DEQUECH, David. “Neoclassical, Mainstream, Orthodox, and Heterodox Economics”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 30, n. 2, p. 279-302, 2007-2008.
DOBUSCH, Leonhard; KAPELLER, Jakob. “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science? New Answers to Veblen’s Old Question”. Journal of Economic Issues, 43, 4, p. 867-898, 2009.
DOBUSCH, Leonhard; KAPELLER, Jakob. “Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics”. Journal of Economic Issues, 46, 4, p. 1035-1057, 2012.
DOW, Sheila C. “Structured Pluralism”. Journal of Economic Methodology, v. 11, 3, p. 275-290, 2004.
DOW, Sheila C. “Axioms and Babylonian Thought: A Reply”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27, 3, p. 385-391, 2005.
DOW, Sheila C. “Plurality in Orthodox and Heterodox Economics”. Journal of Philosophical Economics, 1, 2, p. 73-96, 2008a.
DOW, Sheila C. “A Future for Schools of Thought and Pluralism in Heterodox Economics”. In J.T. Harvey and R.F. Garnett, Jr. (eds.) Future Directions for Heterodox Economics, p. 9-26. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008b.
FLECK, Ludwik. The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [1935] 1979.
FULLBROOK, Edward. The crisis in economics - the post-autistic economics movement: the first 600 days. London; New York: Routledge, 2003.
GARNETT, Robert. “Paradigms and Pluralism in Heterodox Economics”. Review of Political Economy, 18, 4, p. 521-546, 2006.
GARNETT, Robert; OLSEN, Erik K.; STARR, Martha. Economic Pluralism. London: Routledge, 2010.
GIERE, Ronald N. Science without Laws. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999.
HODGSON, Geoffrey; MÄKI, Uskali; MCCLOSKEY, Donald. “A Plea for a Rigorous and Pluralistic Economics”. American Economic Review, v. 82, n. 2, p. xxv, 1992.
HOLCOMBE, Randall G. “Pluralism versus Heterodoxy in Economics and the Social Sciences”. The Journal of Philosophical Economics, v. 1 (2), p. 51-72, 2008.
HOPKINS, Barbara. “The Institutional Barriers to Heterodox Pluralism”. Review of Radical Political Economics, v. 42, 3, p. 338-343, 2010.
KIM, H. S. “An integrative framework for conceptualizing clients: A proposal for a nursing perspective in the new century”. Nursing Science Quarterly, v. 13, n. 1, p. 37-40, 2000.
KING, John E. “Post-Keynesians and Others”. Review of Political Economy, v. 24 (2), p. 305-319, 2012.
KLAES, M. “Evolutionary Economics: In Defence Of ‘Vagueness’”. Journal of Economic Methodology, v. 11, n. 3, p. 359-376, 2004.
KUHN, Thomas S. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 8ª ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, [1962] 2003.
LARUE, Louis. “A defense of reasonable pluralism in economics”. Journal of Economic Methodology, v. 1, p. 1-15, 2022.
LAVOIE, Marc. “Do Heterodox Theories Have Anything in Common? A Post-Keynesian Point of View”. European Journal of Economics: Intervention, v. 3, 1, p. 87-112, 2006.
LAWSON, Tony. “The Nature of Heterodox Economics”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 30, n. 4, p. 483-505, 2006.
LEE, Frederic S. “Pluralism in Heterodox Economics”. In: Economic Pluralism, (eds) Robert Garnett; Erik K. Olsen; Martha Starr, p. 19-35. London: Routledge, 2010.
MÄKI, U. “The one world and the many theories”. In: Salanti e Scrapanti (Org.) Pluralism in Economics: new prespectives in history and methodology. Cheltenham: EAEPE & Edward Elgar, p.37-47, 1997.
MARQUÉS, Gustavo; WEISMAN, Diego. “Not anything goes: a case for a restricted pluralism”. The Journal of Philosophical Economics, v. 2 (1), p. 115-136, 2008.
MELEIS, Afaf Ibrahim. Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.
MORGAN, Mary; RUTHERFORD, Malcolm. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Annual Supplement to Volume 30. History of Political Economy. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.
NELSON, Julie A. “Confronting the Science/Value Split: notes on Feminist Economics, Institutionalism, Pragmatism and Process Thought”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 27 (1), p. 49-64, 2003.
POPPER, K. R. “The Myth of the Framework”: In Defence of Science and Rationality. Routledge: London, 1994.
POPPER, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, [1935] 2002.
SAMUELS, Warren J. “Methodological Pluralism”. In Handbook of Economic Methodology, (eds.) John B. Davis; D. Wade Hands; Uskali Mäki, p. 300-303. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar, 1998.
SAMUELS, Warren J. “Institutional Economics after One Century”. Journal of Economic Issues, v. 34 (2), p. 305-315, 2000.
SENT, Esther-Mirjam. “Pleas for Pluralism”. In Real World Economics: a Post-Autistic Economics Reader, edited by Edward Fullbrook, p. 177-184. London, 2006.
STERMAN, John D.; WITTENBERG, Jason. “Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolution”. Organization Science, v. 10, 3, p. 322-341, 1999.
VAN BOUWEL, Jeroen. “Towards a Framework for Pluralism in Economics”. Post Autistic Economics Review, n. 31, 2005.
WALLER, William T. “Is Convergence among Heterodox Schools Possible, Meaningful, or Desirable?” In Economic Pluralism, Robert Garnett, Erik K. Olsen and Martha Starr (eds.), p. 48-60. London: Routledge, 2010.
Publicado
2024-09-30
Cómo citar
de Carvalho Azevedo Anache, M. (2024). A CONSTRUÇÃO DE UM METAPARADIGMA PARA A CIÊNCIA ECONÔMICA. A Economia Em Revista - AERE, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.4025/econrev.v31i3.69143
Sección
Artigos
Derechos de autor 2024 A Economia em Revista - AERE
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.
