Governance structure and its links with justice in the context of cooperative organizations
Abstract
Objective: Cooperative organizations have unique characteristics in their processes and control structures. Given the nature of the relationships that permeate them, justice has stood out as the basis of these relationships, given that the organizations involved seek justice when comparing the rewards and costs involved in interactions. The objective of this essay is to present a theoretical model that makes it possible to explain the links between the governance package (PGov) and the cooperative members' perception of justice and how both reflect on the relational performance of cooperative organizations.
Method: This study adopts the theoretical essay method, and assumes the epistemological dimension of structuralism, which generally seeks to explore the structure of the phenomenon and, through its essence, determine its determinant links and interrelationships (Triviños, 1997).
Originality/Relevance: Despite advances in understanding the role of control and governance in interorganizational relationships (Ding, Dekker, & Groot, 2013), studies that consider the perspective of justice are still scarce (Dhaundiyal & Coughlan, 2020; Su, Zhang and Guo (2020), and who strive to understand the impacts of these links on performance, which is a differential of the model presented in this essay.
Results: This study proposes a model for analyzing the links between the PGov, Organizational Justice and its effects on relational performance. To do so, it was based on the governance and management control structures defended by van der Meer-Kooistra and Scapens (2008), in organizational justice, outlined in its three aspects: distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice, addressed by Luo (2007), as well as the notions of relational performance adopted by Su et al. (2020).
Theoretical/methodological/practical contributions: The application of the model can bring practical contributions, specifically for the review of the cooperative's PGov and the governance structures to be reformulated (or not), in order to reinforce the justice perceived by the cooperative members. In this way, it is believed that the use of the model will enable the ideal channels of justice to be identified, enhancing the reach of the governance structure and the achievement of the objectives of cooperative organizations.
Downloads
References
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo (1st ed.). São Paulo: Almedina Brasil.
Bialoskorski Neto, S., Barroso, M., & Rezende, A. (2012). Co-operative governance and management control systems: an agency costs theoretical approach. Brazilian Business Review, 9(2), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2012.9.2.4
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048016
Breitenbach, R., Brandão, J. B., & Zorzan, M. (2017). Vantagens e oportunismo no relacionamento entre associados e cooperativa de laticínios. Interações (Campo Grande), 18(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v18i2.1393
Brown, J. R., Cobb, A. T., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). The roles played by interorganizational contracts and justice in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.004
Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
Cook, M. L. (1995). Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-Institutional Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(5), 1153–1159.
Costa, E. G. & Melo, A. A. O. (2017) Governança corporativa: conflitos de agência em cooperativas de crédito mineiras. Gestão & Planejamento, 18(jan./dez.), 386-409.
Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., & Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group and Organization Management, 27(3), 324–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027003002
Delarmelina, N., & Salles, A. O. T. (2016). Um estudo sobre a comercialização da produção de cooperativas agropecuárias sob a ótica da Teoria dos Custos de Transação. Custos e @gronegócio on Line, 12(4), 34–69.
Dhaundiyal, M., & Coughlan, J. (2020). The impact of alliance justice capability on the performance of strategic alliances in the Indian IT sector: the mediating role of inter-firm commitment. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1719587
Ding, R., Dekker, H. C., & Groot, T. (2013). Risk, partner selection and contractual control in interfirm relationships. Management Accounting Research, 24(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.04.007
Fischer, E., & Qaim, M. (2012). Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya. World Development, 40(6), 1255–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018
Frezatti, F., Rocha, W., Nascimento, A. R., & Junqueira, E. (2016). Controle Gerencial: uma abordagem da contabilidade gerencial no contexto econômico, comportamental e sociológico. São Paulo: Atlas.
Geringer, J. M., & Hebert, L. (1991). Measuring Performance of International Joint Ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490302
Greenberg, J. (1987). A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306437
Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados (6th ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Hall, M. (2016). Realising the richness of psychology theory in contingency-based management accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 31, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.11.002
Kamoche, K., & Cunha, M. P. e. (2001). Minimal Structures: From Jazz Improvisation to Product Innovation. Organization Studies, 22(5), 733–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601225001
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1993). Procedural Justice, Attitudes, and Subsidiary Top Management Compliance With Multinationals’ Corporate Strategic Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 502–526. https://doi.org/10.2307/256590
Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600306
Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 894–917. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22798171
Langfield-Smith, K. (2008). The relations between transactional characteristics, trust and risk in the start-up phase of a collaborative alliance. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.001
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Boston: Springer US.
Liu, Y., Liu, T., & Li, Y. (2014). How to inhibit a partner’s strong and weak forms of opportunism: Impacts of network embeddedness and bilateral TSIs. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.08.010
Lopes, A. B. (2017). A Teoria dos Contratos, Governança Corporativa e Contabilidade. In A. B. Lopes & S. Iudícibus (Eds.), Teoria Avançada da Contabilidade (2nd ed., pp. 173–187). São Paulo: Atlas.
Luo, Y. (2007). The independent and interactive roles of procedural, distributive, and interactional justice in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.25526452
Luo, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, Q., Maksimov, V., & Hou, J. (2015). Improving performance and reducing cost in buyer–supplier relationships: The role of justice in curtailing opportunism. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.08.011
Machinski, P. A., Faria, M. C. de, Moreira, V. R., & Ferraresi, A. A. (2016). Agricultural insurance mechanisms through mutualism: the case of an agricultural cooperative. RAUSP Management Journal, 51(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.06.004
Meneghetti, F. K. (2011). O que é um ensaio-teórico?. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 15(2), 320-332. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552011000200010
Pivoto, D., Finger, M. I., Waquil, P., & Souza, M. de. (2013). O problema do carona nas cooperativas agropecuárias do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista de Política Agrícola, 22(4), 109–122.
Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.249
Ring, P. S., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410122009
Rodrigues, J. A., Lauermann, G. J., Moreira, V. R., Ferraresi, A. A., & Souza, A. (2018). Estrutura de capital e peculiaridades regionais nas cooperativas agropecuárias do Paraná - Brasil. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 56(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-94790560202
Roehrich, J. K., Selviaridis, K., Kalra, J., Van der Valk, W., & Fang, F. (2020). Inter-organizational governance: a review, conceptualisation and extension. Production Planning & Control, 31(6), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1647364
Rupp, D. E., & Cropanzano, R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 925–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00036-5
Schepker, D. J., Oh, W.-Y., Martynov, A., & Poppo, L. (2014). The Many Futures of Contracts: Moving Beyond Structure and Safeguarding to Coordination and Adaptation. Journal of Management, 40(1), 193–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313491289
Simioni, F. J., Siqueira, E. S., Binotto, E., Spers, E. E., & Araújo, Z. A. S. de. (2009). Lealdade e oportunismo nas cooperativas: desafios e mudanças na gestão. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 47(3), 739–765. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20032009000300010
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.434
Su, X., Zhang, H., & Guo, S. (2020). A Model and Complexity Analysis of the Relationship Based on Organizational Justice and Embeddedness Theories. Complexity, 2020, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6129840
Trada, S., & Goyal, V. (2017). The dual effects of perceived unfairness on opportunism in channel relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.008
Triviños, A. N. S. (1997). Introdução à Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais: a Pesquisa Qualitativa em Educação (Vol. 1). São Paulo: Atlas. https://doi.org/10.33081/formação.v1i20.2335
Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 850–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.850
van der Meer-Kooistra, J., & Scapens, R. W. (2008). The governance of lateral relations between and within organisations. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.08.001
Walter, J., Lechner, C., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2008). Disentangling alliance management processes: Decision making, politicality, and alliance performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 530–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00749.x
Wang, A., & Dyball, M. C. (2019). Management controls and their links with fairness and performance in inter‐organisational relationships. Accounting & Finance, 59(3), 1835–1868. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12408
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. Nova York: Free Press.
Zylbersztajn, D. (1994). Organização de cooperativas: desafios e tendências. RAUSP Management Journal, 29(3), 23–32.
Zylbersztajn, D. (2002). Quatro estratégias fundamentais para cooperativas agrícolas. XIV Seminário de Política Econômica: Cooperativismo e Agronegócio. Viçosa: UFV.
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 3.0 properly.