<b>Investigation of the effect of temperature and pretreatment on the rehydration capacities of dried nectarine slices

Authors

  • Fatma Soysal T.R. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Directorate of Central and Laboratory for Restoration and Conservation
  • Osman İsmail Yildiz Technical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v39i5.30412

Keywords:

rehydration curves, pretreatment, effective diffusivity, mathematical models.

Abstract

 In this study, the effect of temperature and pretreatment on the rehydration capacity of nectarine slices dried either with pretreatment and under ambient conditions (`natural´) at 50°C in a cabinet dryer was investigated. Rehydration proceeded with distilled water at three different rehydration temperatures (25, 50, and 75°C). Initial rehydration rates increased with rehydration temperature for all samples and were highest for the potassium carbonate (potas)-pretreated samples. At all rehydration temperatures, the equilibrium moisture content was highest for those pretreated with potas solution. The values of Deff varied from 2.79 to 4.32x10-10, 1.72 to 2.34x10-10, and 1.86 to 2.58x10-10 m2 s-1 for potassium carbonate, citric acid, and natural samples, respectively. The activation energy values were 5.65, 6.06, and 8.29 kJmol-1 for citric acid, natural, and potassium carbonate nectarine slices, respectively. The rehydration data were fitted to Peleg and first-order kinetic models: the first order kinetic model was found to be the most appropriate model for rehydration of nectarine slices.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-15

How to Cite

Soysal, F., & İsmail, O. (2017). <b>Investigation of the effect of temperature and pretreatment on the rehydration capacities of dried nectarine slices. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 39(5), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v39i5.30412

Issue

Section

Science, Food Technology and Food Engineering

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus