Production and nutritive value of ten forage grasses in the northwest region of the state of São Paulo
Abstract
The experiment was carried out in the Northwest region of the State of São Paulo, Brazil, to evaluate ten grasses recently introduced in the region, during two wet (WS) and two dry (DS) seasons. The grasses studied were: Cynodon spp.( cvs. Tifton 68, Tifton 78, Tifton 85, Florakirk, Florico, Florona, and Coastcross) , Paspalum notatum cv. Tifton 9, Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu, Panicum maximum cv. Tanzânia. The accumulated DM production did not differ among the grasses evaluated. Higher contents of CP (125 to 145 g.kg-1) were observed in the cultivars of the genus Cynodon in the WS. Higher values of NDF were observed in the species of Cynodon and Paspalum in the WS and DS. The IVDMD varied from 436 to 699 g.kg-1, being the lower value observed in the cv. Tifton 9 in the WS and the higher value in the cv. Tifton 68 in the DS. The seasonal difference in the production of DM was more pronounced in the cv. Tifton 85, which presented only 9% of the annual production in the DSDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-30
How to Cite
Soares Filho, C. V., de Andrade Rodrigues, L. R., & Venturoli Perri, S. H. (2008). Production and nutritive value of ten forage grasses in the northwest region of the state of São Paulo. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 24, 1377-1384. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v24i0.2385
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 