Beans quality of various coffee plant (<em>Coffea Arabica</em> L.) cultivars
Abstract
Aiming at evaluating the bean quality of the coffee cultivars, Coffea Arabica L. (Rubiaceae), fruits were collected at the cherry phase, cultivated on Experimental Farm of the Epamig-Lavras, MG. The experimental design was completely randomized with eight cultivars: Icatú Vermelho e Amarelo, Catuaí Vermelho e Amarelo, Topázio, Acaiá Cerrado, Mundo Novo e Rubi, with three replicates. The grains chemical analyses were: polyphenoloxidase activity, total titrable acidity, total sugars, non reducing and reducing sugars, total phenolic compounds and electric conductivity. The cultivars showed variations in the chemical composition and consequently, in the quality. Both Acaiá do Cerrado and Icatú Vermelho were classified by the polyphenoloxidase enzymatic activity as hard beverage. The other cultivars were classified as soft and only soft beverage standard. The cultivar Acaiá do Cerrado also showed the highest values of electric conductivity, total phenolic compounds and total titrable acidity, which coincides with the poor quality cultivarDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-30
How to Cite
Malta, M. R., Santos, M. L. dos, & Melo Silva, F. A. de. (2008). Beans quality of various coffee plant (<em>Coffea Arabica</em> L.) cultivars. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 24, 1385-1390. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v24i0.2386
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 