S<sub>1</sub> and S<sub>2</sub> imbred progenies selection in program for intrapopulational improvement of popcorn
Abstract
One-hundred S1 and 225 S2 progenies obtained from the popcorn population “Beija-Flor” Zea mays L. (Poaceae), were evaluated in relation to yield, popping expansion and other agronomic characters. Genetic parameters were estimated and the predicted gains by selection were obtained according to several selection methods. Significant genotypic variability was observed for both yield and volume expansion. The direct selection for popping expansion was the method used in selecting thirty S1 progenies for intrapopulational improvement. A gain of 1.08 mL/g for volume expansion was predicted. The expected indirect gain for grain yield is irrelevant, mainly because of the negative genotypic correlation between these characters. For selection of thirty S2 families the index of Mulamba and Mock was used, with weights 1 and 3 for yield and volume expansion, respectively. A predicted gain of 0.81 mL/g was obtained for popping expansionDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-30
How to Cite
Vilarinho, A. A., Soriano Viana, J. M., Marinho Câmara, T. M., & dos Santos, J. F. (2008). S<sub>1</sub> and S<sub>2</sub> imbred progenies selection in program for intrapopulational improvement of popcorn. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 24, 1419-1425. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v24i0.2393
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 