<b>Entrepreneurship in the context of changes in the workplace</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v30i2.297

  • Glaucia de Souza Munhoz Faculdades Metropolitanas de Maringá
  • William Antonio Borges Cesumar
  • Carolina Spack Kemmelmeier Cesumar
Keywords: entrepreneurship, workplace, outsourcing, precariousness, market

Abstract

The present article proposes the analysis, beginning from the second Industrial Revolution, of the changes in the working processes, especially in management models, which affected relationships and therefore social relations. From these relationships, it seeks to clarify and to infer the emergence of entrepreneurship in the present. The genesis of this new acting model, praised by the market, is believed to be derived from scientific management practices, revisited here based of the writings of H. Braverman. Flexible management presents, among other practices, the outsourcing of part of its activities, by adopting the Lean Production. Thus, under the orientation of authors such as F. Chesnais and D. Harvey, it can be evidenced that, initially, there was a strong interest from the capital in discouraging autonomous/independent activity, classifying it as insecure and precarious. Nowadays, the discourse is reversed, i.e. entrepreneurship is seen as a solution for the lack of job posts and market competitiveness, due to the decrease in the high costs generated by labor legislation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Glaucia de Souza Munhoz, Faculdades Metropolitanas de Maringá
Tem experiência na área de Administração. Atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: Espaço organizacional, Empregabilidade, Banco do Brasil, Programa de desligamento voluntário, Identidade coletiva e Maringá (PR). Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-12-18
How to Cite
Munhoz, G. de S., Borges, W. A., & Kemmelmeier, C. S. (2008). <b>Entrepreneurship in the context of changes in the workplace</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v30i2.297. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, 30(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihumansoc.v30i2.297
Section
Social Sciences